What is the obstetric score for a patient with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Obstetric Score for a Patient with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)

For a patient with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), the obstetric score should be recorded as G(total number of pregnancies)P(term births-preterm births-abortions-living children), including all pregnancy losses regardless of gestational age.

Understanding RPL and Obstetric Scoring

  • RPL affects approximately 5% of couples attempting pregnancy 1
  • RPL is defined as two or more failed clinical pregnancies according to current guidelines, though some older definitions required three consecutive losses 2, 1
  • Up to 75% of RPL cases are idiopathic, with the remainder attributed to identifiable causes such as uterine malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome, and parental chromosomal abnormalities 3

Components of the Obstetric Score

When documenting the obstetric score for a patient with RPL:

  • G (Gravidity): Count all pregnancies regardless of outcome, including all miscarriages/pregnancy losses 1
  • P (Parity): Record using the TPAL format:
    • T: Term births (≥37 weeks)
    • P: Preterm births (<37 weeks)
    • A: Abortions (includes all pregnancy losses regardless of cause - spontaneous miscarriages, elective terminations, and ectopic pregnancies)
    • L: Living children 4

Special Considerations for RPL Patients

  • All pregnancy losses should be counted in the "A" portion of the TPAL score, regardless of whether they were:

    • First trimester losses (<10 weeks) 3
    • Second trimester losses 5
    • Biochemical pregnancies with positive pregnancy tests 4
    • Ectopic pregnancies 5
  • Documenting the timing and pattern of losses is clinically important, as different etiologies may present with losses at different gestational ages 6

Clinical Implications of Accurate Scoring

  • Proper documentation of obstetric history helps identify patients who meet criteria for RPL evaluation after two consecutive losses 1

  • Accurate scoring guides appropriate testing for known causes of RPL, including:

    • Antiphospholipid syndrome testing 5
    • Uterine anomaly evaluation 4
    • Parental chromosomal analysis 3
    • Thrombophilia testing in selected cases 5
  • The obstetric score helps determine management approaches, such as:

    • Need for anticoagulation with low-dose aspirin and/or heparin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome 5
    • Consideration of progesterone supplementation in patients with first-trimester bleeding 1
    • Potential surgical correction of uterine anomalies 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to count biochemical pregnancies or very early losses in the obstetric score 4
  • Not including elective terminations in the "A" portion of the score 4
  • Omitting ectopic pregnancies from the count 5
  • Neglecting to update the obstetric score after each pregnancy event 1

Remember that accurate documentation of the obstetric history is essential for proper evaluation, management, and counseling of patients with RPL 1, 4.

References

Research

Evaluation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 2024

Research

ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.

Human reproduction open, 2018

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Recurrent pregnancy loss: a disease of inflammation and coagulation.

The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.