What is the preferred beta-blocker, carvedilol (Carvedilol) or metoprolol (Metoprolol), for treating Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Carvedilol and metoprolol succinate are equally effective in reducing mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF, with both being recommended as first-line beta-blockers by current guidelines. 1

Guideline Recommendations

  • The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines specifically recommend using one of three beta-blockers proven to reduce mortality in HFrEF: bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol succinate 1
  • These beta-blockers have a Class I, Level of Evidence A recommendation for all patients with current or previous symptoms of HFrEF 1
  • Beta-blocker therapy provides high economic value in HFrEF management 1
  • Guidelines do not express a preference between carvedilol and metoprolol succinate, considering them equally effective based on major clinical trials 1

Key Differences Between Carvedilol and Metoprolol

Pharmacological Properties

  • Carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional alpha-1 blocking properties (vasodilatory effect) 2
  • Metoprolol succinate is a cardioselective beta-1 blocker without vasodilatory properties 3

Metabolism Considerations

  • Metoprolol is primarily metabolized by CYP2D6, making it more susceptible to genetic variations in this enzyme 4
  • Carvedilol relies only partially on CYP2D6 for metabolism, potentially making it more suitable for patients with CYP2D6 genetic variations 4

Comparative Effectiveness

  • Meta-analyses comparing carvedilol and metoprolol succinate show similar effects in reducing all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients 5
  • Some observational studies suggest potential superiority of carvedilol over metoprolol succinate in certain populations, with one large VA study showing improved survival with carvedilol (hazard ratio for metoprolol vs. carvedilol: 1.069,95% CI: 1.046-1.092) 6
  • Both medications have been shown to reduce heart failure readmissions and mortality when used at appropriate doses 7

Dosing Considerations

  • Target doses for beta-blockers in HFrEF:
    • Carvedilol: 25 mg twice daily (50 mg total daily dose) 1
    • Metoprolol succinate: 200 mg once daily 1
  • Guidelines recommend titrating to target doses or maximally tolerated doses 1
  • At least 50% of target dose should be achieved when possible 1

Clinical Approach to Selection

  1. Consider patient-specific factors:

    • In patients with bronchospastic disease: Metoprolol may be preferred due to its relative beta-1 selectivity 3
    • In patients with peripheral vascular disease: Carvedilol may offer advantages due to its vasodilatory properties 2
    • In patients with known CYP2D6 genetic variations: Carvedilol may be more suitable 4
  2. Dosing frequency considerations:

    • Metoprolol succinate: Once-daily dosing 1
    • Carvedilol: Twice-daily dosing 1
  3. Monitoring and titration:

    • Start at low doses and titrate gradually to target doses 1
    • Monitor for bradycardia, hypotension, and worsening heart failure 3
    • Maintain long-term treatment even if symptoms improve 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Abrupt discontinuation of either beta-blocker can lead to clinical deterioration and should be avoided 1, 3
  • Using non-evidence-based beta-blockers (other than carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or bisoprolol) is not recommended 1
  • Failure to titrate to target doses may result in suboptimal outcomes 1
  • Not recognizing that beta-blockers should be initiated in all eligible HFrEF patients, even when asymptomatic or when symptoms are mild 1

In conclusion, both carvedilol and metoprolol succinate are effective beta-blockers for HFrEF management. While some observational data suggest potential differences in specific populations, current guidelines consider them equally effective when used at appropriate doses.

Related Questions

What is the preferred beta-blocker, Metoprolol or Carvedilol, in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?
What is the role of beta (beta blockers) blockers, such as metoprolol (metoprolol) or carvedilol (carvedilol), in patients with normal Ejection Fraction (EF)?
Is carvedilol (a beta-blocker) a suitable alternative to metoprolol for a patient with heart failure, persistent atrial fibrillation (AFib), and low ejection fraction, who is concerned about metoprolol crossing the blood-brain barrier?
What is the recommended initial beta-blocker for a patient with atrial fibrillation (afib) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (hfref)?
What is the role of metoprolol (beta-blocker) in the treatment of orthopnea due to heart failure?
What is the next step in treatment for aspiration pneumonia that is deteriorating on clindamycin (antibiotic)?
Is an Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) more effective than carvedilol in treating Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?
Can an Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) be combined with a beta-blocker, such as carvedilol, in the treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?
What is the antibiotic of choice for diabetic foot infections?
What is the comprehensive treatment plan for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) using beta blockers, Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors (ARNI), diuretics, and dapagliflozin?
What is the most accurate method to diagnose traumatic aortic arch injury?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.