Should we add a Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) to the treatment regimen of a patient with a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 37%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Adding Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) for LVEF 37%

Yes, a Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) should be added to the treatment regimen for a patient with LVEF of 37%, as this falls within the guideline recommendation for MRAs in patients with LVEF ≤35-40% who have heart failure symptoms. 1

Guideline Recommendations for MRA Use

  • MRAs are recommended in patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure who have LVEF of 35% or less to reduce morbidity and mortality (Class I, Level of Evidence: A) 1
  • MRAs are also recommended following acute MI in patients with LVEF of 40% or less who develop symptoms of heart failure or have diabetes mellitus (Class I, Level of Evidence: B) 1
  • Despite strong evidence, MRAs remain underutilized, with only about 33% of eligible patients receiving this therapy 1

Patient Selection Criteria

Before initiating MRA therapy, ensure the patient meets these criteria:

  • LVEF ≤35% (patient's LVEF of 37% is very close to this threshold) 1
  • NYHA class II-IV symptoms 1
  • Already on beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors/ARBs/ARNI 1
  • Serum creatinine ≤2.5 mg/dL for men and ≤2.0 mg/dL for women (or eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m²) 1
  • Serum potassium <5.0 mEq/L 1

Clinical Benefits of MRA Therapy

  • Reduces mortality by 30% in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction 2
  • Reduces risk of hospitalization for cardiac causes by 30% 2
  • Benefits appear consistent across subgroups, with potentially greater benefit in patients with low baseline serum potassium 2

Monitoring Requirements

  • Check potassium levels and renal function 3 days and 1 week after initiating therapy 1
  • Continue monitoring at least monthly for the first 3 months 1
  • Monitor for hyperkalemia, which occurs in 2-5% of clinical trial patients but up to 24-36% in real-world settings 1
  • If potassium exceeds 5.5 mEq/L, consider dose reduction or discontinuation 1

Dosing Considerations

  • Start with low dose (spironolactone 25 mg once daily or eplerenone 25 mg once daily) 2, 3
  • May reduce to 25 mg every other day if not tolerated 2
  • May increase to 50 mg daily if tolerated at lower dose after 4-8 weeks 2, 3
  • Mean effective dose in clinical trials was approximately 26 mg daily 2

Implementation Challenges

  • Despite Class I recommendations, MRAs remain significantly underutilized, with only 22-33% of eligible patients receiving this therapy 1, 4
  • Only about 9.5% of eligible patients not prescribed an MRA at discharge receive it within 3 months of follow-up 4
  • Factors associated with higher likelihood of MRA prescription include lower LVEF and more recent care (increasing trend over time) 4

Special Considerations

  • For patients with LVEF between 35-40%, clinical judgment is warranted, but given the mortality benefit and the patient's LVEF being very close to the 35% threshold, adding an MRA is reasonable 1, 5
  • In patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure, MRA use was associated with better long-term survival in patients with LVEF <40% 5
  • The benefits of MRA therapy appear similar in patients with or without chronic kidney disease (as long as eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m²) 5

Given the patient's LVEF of 37%, which is very close to the guideline threshold of 35%, and the significant mortality benefit demonstrated in clinical trials, adding an MRA to the treatment regimen is appropriate to improve outcomes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.