What is the sensitivity and specificity of cholera antigen (Ag) stool tests?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Cholera Antigen Stool Tests

The sensitivity of cholera antigen stool tests ranges from 72-90% and specificity ranges from 87-95% when tested directly on stool samples, with improved specificity of 97-100% after enrichment. 1, 2

Performance of Different Cholera Rapid Diagnostic Tests

Direct Testing (Without Enrichment)

  • SD Bioline Cholera test shows sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 95.2% when compared to a reference standard combining culture and PCR 2
  • Crystal VC demonstrates high sensitivity (72-98.6%) but moderate specificity (71.1-86.8%) in direct testing 1, 3
  • Cholkit (locally produced RDT in Bangladesh) shows sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 90.2%, comparable to commercial tests 1
  • SMART-II Cholera O1 test shows the highest sensitivity (86.1%) among RDTs in direct testing 4

After Enrichment

  • SD Bioline's performance improves significantly after enrichment, with sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 100% 2
  • Crystal VC shows sensitivity of 68% and improved specificity of 97.5% after enrichment 1
  • SMART-II maintains high sensitivity (78.8%) after enrichment 4

Factors Affecting Test Performance

  • Sample preparation: Enrichment in alkaline peptone water generally improves specificity but may slightly reduce sensitivity in some tests 4, 1
  • Reference standard: Performance metrics vary depending on whether culture alone or culture plus PCR is used as the reference standard 2
  • Test interpretation: Some tests (Crystal VC and Artron) frequently show false positive O139 bands 3
  • Disease severity: Performance may vary based on bacterial load in stool samples 4

Limitations and Considerations

  • PCR-based detection methods show superior sensitivity (98.4%) compared to antibody-based RDTs but lower specificity (75.3%) 4
  • Newer molecular diagnostic approaches like Rapid LAMP-based Diagnostic Tests (RLDT) can detect approximately 10⁴ CFU/gm of stool within 40 minutes 5
  • Most evaluations have been conducted in endemic settings where V. cholerae O1 is the predominant serotype 1
  • RDTs are most useful in outbreak/epidemic situations where rapid detection is critical for public health response 4

Practical Applications

  • Cholera RDTs meet the Global Task Force for Cholera Control recommendations (sensitivity ≥90%, specificity ≥85%) when properly used 2
  • These tests are valuable in resource-limited settings without laboratory infrastructure for culture-based diagnosis 3
  • For optimal results, tests should be performed on fresh liquid stool samples that conform to the shape of the container 4
  • While not ideal for individual clinical diagnosis due to suboptimal specificity in direct testing, these tests are valuable for outbreak detection and surveillance 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.