Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Test Results
The pulmonary function test results show a mixed pattern with elements of both obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defects, requiring comprehensive evaluation and likely bronchodilator therapy to address the underlying respiratory condition. 1
Analysis of Key Parameters
- FEV1/FVC ratio of 68% indicates an obstructive ventilatory defect, as it falls below the threshold of 70% which defines airflow obstruction according to guidelines 1
- The FVC values show significant variability across measurements, with some values appearing normal and others reduced, suggesting possible inconsistent testing technique or variable airflow limitation 1
- MEF (mid-expiratory flow) values show marked variability, with some measurements significantly below predicted values, indicating small airway dysfunction 1
- The PEF (peak expiratory flow) measurements are inconsistent, with some values appearing normal and others reduced, which may indicate variable upper airway function or effort 1
Classification of Severity
- Based on the FEV1 values (which appear to be between 60-70% of predicted in some measurements), this represents moderate airflow obstruction according to the severity classification system 1
- The variable pattern with some normal FVC values but reduced FEV1/FVC ratio is consistent with early to moderate obstructive lung disease 1
- The concave appearance suggested by the flow measurements (particularly the reduced MEF values) is characteristic of small airways disease 1
Diagnostic Considerations
Primary consideration should be given to:
Additional testing needed:
Management Recommendations
- Initiate bronchodilator therapy with short-acting beta-agonists to address the obstructive component 1
- Consider inhaled corticosteroids if there is significant bronchodilator reversibility suggesting asthma 1, 2
- Obtain complete clinical history focusing on:
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
- Inconsistent effort during testing can significantly affect results, particularly FVC and PEF measurements 1, 5
- Diurnal variation in airway resistance can affect test results, with values typically higher in the morning and lower at midday (up to 20% variation) 5
- Single measurements should not be over-interpreted; serial testing may be necessary to establish a clear pattern 1, 5
- The FEV1/FVC ratio should be interpreted using the lower limit of normal rather than fixed cutoffs, especially in older adults where fixed cutoffs may overdiagnose obstruction 1, 2
- Isolated abnormalities in mid-expiratory flows (MEF 25-75%) without other abnormalities have limited clinical significance 1, 3