Management of Abdominal Pain and Distention After CT Abdomen and Pelvis
CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is the recommended imaging study for evaluating this patient with worsening abdominal distention, taut abdomen, and discomfort following initial CT imaging. 1
Initial Assessment
- Perform a focused physical examination to evaluate the taut and distended abdomen, looking specifically for peritoneal signs (rebound tenderness, guarding), which would indicate possible peritonitis 2
- Check vital signs for fever, tachycardia, or hypotension which may indicate infection or sepsis 3
- Review the results of the initial CT abdomen and pelvis to identify any findings that may explain the worsening symptoms 2
- Obtain laboratory studies including complete blood count to assess for leukocytosis, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis 3
Diagnostic Approach
Imaging Considerations
- If the initial CT findings were inconclusive or if the patient's condition has significantly worsened, a repeat CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is indicated 1
- IV contrast improves characterization and detection of subtle bowel wall abnormalities and complications such as abscess formation 2
- CT has been shown to change the leading diagnosis in 49% of patients and alter management plans in 42% of patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain 1
Potential Diagnoses to Consider
Intra-abdominal infection/abscess
Diverticulitis
Bowel obstruction
Iatrogenic perforation (if patient recently had colonoscopy)
Treatment Recommendations
Antimicrobial Therapy
- For suspected intra-abdominal infection, initiate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics 2
- Options include:
Interventional Management
- For localized fluid collections or abscesses >3 cm identified on CT, percutaneous drainage is indicated 2
- The approach (transabdominal, transgluteal, etc.) depends on the specific location of the collection 2
Surgical Considerations
- Surgical consultation should be obtained if there are signs of peritonitis, free perforation, or bowel ischemia 2
- Early surgical intervention (within 24 hours of perforation) is associated with better outcomes if perforation is suspected 2
Monitoring and Follow-up
- Close monitoring of vital signs, abdominal examination, and laboratory values is essential 2
- If the patient does not respond to initial therapy within 4-7 days, further diagnostic investigation including repeat CT imaging should be performed 2
- Extra-abdominal sources of infection and non-infectious inflammatory conditions should also be investigated if the patient is not experiencing a satisfactory clinical response 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on abdominal X-rays for diagnosis, as they have limited diagnostic value and may miss significant pathology 1
- Do not assume constipation is always functional without appropriate imaging when pain is a significant feature 1
- Early improvement with conservative treatment does not rule out the potential need for surgery; continue close monitoring 2
- Do not delay surgical intervention if there are signs of peritonitis or clinical deterioration 2