What is the best approach for planning a total knee replacement in a patient with a valgus knee?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Planning a Total Knee Replacement in a Valgus Knee

The lateral approach is the preferred method for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with valgus knee deformity as it allows better correction of the deformity, shorter operating times, and potentially less use of constrained implants compared to the medial approach. 1

Understanding Valgus Knee Deformity

Valgus knee deformity occurs in approximately 10% of patients undergoing TKA and presents specific challenges due to:

  • Anatomical variations including lateral cartilage erosion, lateral condylar hypoplasia, and metaphyseal femur and tibial plateau remodeling 2
  • Soft tissue contractures of lateral structures: lateral collateral ligament, posterolateral capsule, popliteus tendon, hamstring tendons, lateral head of gastrocnemius, and iliotibial band 2

Preoperative Planning

Imaging Assessment

  • Standing AP and lateral radiographs and tangential axial view of the patellofemoral joint are essential for initial evaluation 3
  • Full-length standing hip-to-ankle radiographs provide optimal assessment of alignment and mechanical axis 3
  • CT scan may be used to determine axial rotation of the femoral component 3

Clinical Evaluation

  • Assess the degree of deformity (Ranawat classification can be used) 4
  • Evaluate soft tissue contractures and medial ligamentous laxity 2
  • Determine the need for constrained implants based on ligamentous stability 2

Surgical Approach Options

Lateral Parapatellar Approach (Recommended)

  • Provides direct access to tight lateral structures that need release 1
  • Preserves medial blood supply to the patella 5
  • Results in better patellar tracking and alignment stability 5
  • Allows better correction of valgus deformity (10.8° vs 7.3° with medial approach) 1
  • Shorter operating times (87 min vs 137 min with medial approach) 1
  • May require less use of constrained implants (9% vs 16% with medial approach) 1
  • Can be performed with a Z-capsuloplasty modification for severe deformities 4

Medial Parapatellar Approach

  • Standard approach for TKA but less optimal for valgus deformity 1
  • Often requires lateral release which may compromise patellar blood supply 5
  • More technically challenging for accessing lateral tight structures 1

Soft Tissue Management

Sequential Lateral Release (when using lateral approach)

  1. Iliotibial band at Gerdy's tubercle (required in 88% of cases) 6
  2. Iliotibial band at joint level (required in 46% of cases) 6
  3. Lateral collateral ligament (required in 13% of cases) 6
  4. Popliteus tendon (required in 4% of cases) 6

Bone Cuts Considerations

  • Distal femoral cut should be perpendicular to the mechanical axis 2
  • Consider slight under-correction of severe deformities to prevent medial instability 2
  • Tibial cut should be perpendicular to the mechanical axis with minimal resection 2

Implant Selection

  • Standard posterior-stabilized implants are usually sufficient with proper soft tissue balancing 4
  • Constrained implants may be necessary in cases with significant medial ligamentous attenuation or inability to balance the knee 2
  • Lateral approach may reduce the need for constrained implants (9% vs 16% with medial approach) 1

Postoperative Management

  • Radiographic follow-up should include standing AP and lateral views to assess alignment 3
  • Early mobilization is recommended to reduce length of hospital stay 3
  • Supervised exercise program during the first 2 months improves physical function 3
  • Regular follow-up every 1-2 years is recommended for long-term monitoring 3

Potential Complications and Pitfalls

  • Residual instability due to inadequate soft tissue balancing 2
  • Patellar maltracking (less common with lateral approach) 5
  • Transient common peroneal nerve palsy (reported in lateral approach) 4
  • Recurrence of deformity due to under-correction 2

Clinical Outcomes

  • Good to excellent results in 94.3% of cases with lateral approach 5
  • Better postoperative flexion with lateral approach (123.8° vs 109° with medial approach) 6
  • Improved knee stability with non-constrained prostheses 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.