What is the protocol for a triphasic Computed Tomography (CT) scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Triphasic CT Scan Protocol

A triphasic CT scan involves three distinct imaging phases: non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, allowing comprehensive evaluation of tissue perfusion characteristics for optimal detection and characterization of lesions, particularly in the liver. 1

Protocol Components

Timing of Phases

  • Non-contrast phase: Initial scan without contrast enhancement 1
  • Arterial phase: Acquired 15-25 seconds after contrast injection (typically 22-27 seconds) to capture arterial enhancement 1, 2
  • Portal venous phase: Acquired 49-73 seconds after contrast injection to capture portal venous enhancement 1, 2
  • Some protocols may include a delayed/equilibrium phase at 8-10 minutes post-injection for further characterization 2

Contrast Administration

  • Contrast medium: Non-ionic iodinated contrast agents are typically used 3
  • Injection protocol options:
    • Standard bolus: Single injection followed by saline flush 1
    • Split-bolus technique: Two separate boluses of contrast medium 4
      • First bolus (75-90 mL at 2.0 mL/sec): For portal venous phase enhancement
      • Second bolus (60 mL at 3.5 mL/sec): For arterial phase enhancement
      • Each bolus followed by 20 mL saline flush at same flow rate 4
    • For left-sided cardiac valve assessment: Triphasic protocol consisting of contrast bolus, followed by contrast-saline mixture, then pure saline 1

Technical Parameters

  • Scanner type: Multidetector-row CT is preferred for optimal resolution 4
  • Slice thickness: Thin slices (3-5 mm) are essential for adequate staging accuracy 1
  • ECG gating: Recommended for cardiac applications to eliminate motion artifacts 1
  • Radiation dose considerations: Split-bolus technique can reduce radiation dose by 35-40% compared to traditional triphasic scanning 4

Clinical Applications

Liver Imaging

  • Triphasic CT enables characterization of a wide range of focal liver lesions 2
  • Different lesions show characteristic enhancement patterns across the three phases:
    • Hypervascular lesions (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) are better detected in arterial phase 5, 6
    • Hypovascular lesions are better visualized in portal venous phase 2, 6
    • Well-differentiated HCCs may remain hyperattenuated in portal venous phase 6

Other Applications

  • Thoracic aortic aneurysm/dissection: Triple-phase imaging helps detect endoleaks and evaluate stent placement 1
  • Colorectal cancer staging: Multiphase imaging improves detection of liver metastases 1
  • Pyelonephritis: Nephrographic phase is most important, but triphasic protocol may be used for comprehensive evaluation 1
  • Cardiac valve assessment: Triphasic protocol optimizes visualization of prosthetic heart valves 1

Protocol Variations and Considerations

  • Dual-energy CT option: Can potentially reduce radiation dose by generating virtual non-contrast images from contrast-enhanced acquisitions 1
  • Patient-specific adjustments:
    • Contrast volume and flow rate may need adjustment based on patient weight and cardiac output 1, 3
    • For renal insufficiency patients, consider alternative imaging modalities or modified protocols 1
  • Specialized protocols:
    • For pulmonary valve assessment: Use protocols similar to CT pulmonary embolism studies 1
    • For tricuspid valve: Consider tailored triphasic contrast protocol with decreased flow rate during final phase 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate timing of phases can lead to suboptimal enhancement and missed lesions 2, 5
  • Failure to use appropriate contrast concentration may result in poor tissue differentiation 3
  • Insufficient slice thickness can reduce detection of small lesions 1
  • Not accounting for patient-specific factors (weight, cardiac output, renal function) may lead to suboptimal imaging or complications 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.