International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for Initial Assessment of BPH
The AUA Symptom Index (identical to the seven symptom questions of the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) should be used as the symptom-scoring instrument in the initial assessment of each patient presenting with suspected Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). 1
IPSS Assessment Components
- The IPSS consists of seven questions that assess both irritative symptoms (frequency, urgency, nocturia) and obstructive symptoms (incomplete emptying, stopping and starting, weak stream, pushing or straining) 1
- Symptom severity is classified as mild (score 0-7), moderate (score 8-19), or severe (score 20-35) 2
- The IPSS includes a Disease Specific Quality of Life (QoL) question that measures how bothered the patient is by their urinary symptoms 1
Clinical Value of IPSS in BPH Management
- IPSS is superior to an unstructured interview in quantifying symptom frequency and severity 1
- The tool has been validated for clarity, test/retest reliability, internal consistency, and criteria strength 1
- IPSS has demonstrated high sensitivity to change following treatment interventions, making it valuable for monitoring treatment response 3
- IPSS scores correlate well with quality of life measures and objective parameters like peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) 4, 5
Management Algorithm Based on IPSS
- For patients with mild symptoms (IPSS <8): Annual monitoring is recommended 6
- For patients with moderate symptoms (IPSS 8-19):
- For patients with severe symptoms (IPSS >20): Consider referral to urology for possible surgical intervention 6
Follow-Up Protocol Using IPSS
- First follow-up visit should be scheduled 4-12 weeks after initiating alpha blockers, PDE5 inhibitors, anticholinergics, or beta-3 agonists 7, 2
- For 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, first follow-up should be at 3-6 months due to longer onset of action 7, 2
- IPSS should be readministered at each follow-up visit to objectively assess symptom changes 7
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on IPSS without considering the patient's bother level - an intervention may be more appropriate for a moderately symptomatic patient who is bothered than for a severely symptomatic patient who is not bothered 1
- Failing to explain the questions to patients who may not fully understand the intent of the questionnaire 1
- Using IPSS as a replacement for personal discussion of symptoms with the patient 1
- Not considering literacy levels when administering the questionnaire - some patients may require assistance 5
Additional Considerations
- The IPSS has been successfully translated and validated in multiple languages, including Arabic and other non-English languages, demonstrating its global applicability 3, 5
- In patients with low literacy levels, visual versions of the questionnaire (VPSS) have shown good correlation with the standard IPSS 5
- IPSS has demonstrated value in determining treatment efficacy, with studies showing significant improvements in scores following various interventions for BPH 4, 8