What is the recommended treatment for a buckle fracture of the ulnar metaphysis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Buckle Fractures of the Ulnar Metaphysis

For buckle fractures of the ulnar metaphysis, removable splinting is recommended over casting as it provides better physical functioning while maintaining adequate healing.

Recommended Treatment Approach

  • Removable splinting is the preferred treatment for stable buckle fractures of the ulnar metaphysis, as it allows for better physical functioning compared to rigid immobilization 1, 2
  • Children treated with removable splints demonstrate significantly better physical functioning and less difficulty with daily activities than those treated with casts 2
  • Rigid immobilization (casting) is unnecessary for stable buckle fractures and should be reserved for displaced fractures 1

Clinical Benefits of Removable Splinting

  • Removable splinting results in:
    • Better physical functioning at 14 days post-injury 2
    • Less difficulty with bathing and other activities of daily living 2
    • No significant difference in pain compared to casting 2
    • No increased risk of refracture compared to casting 2

Duration of Treatment

  • Typical immobilization period is 3 weeks, though this may vary based on clinical assessment 2
  • After the immobilization period, the splint can be removed without requiring a clinical visit for removal 1

Special Considerations

  • In very young children (under 3 years), careful assessment of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability is important, especially if the buckle fracture is associated with a displaced distal metaphyseal ulnar fracture 3
  • If there are concerns about DRUJ instability (suggesting a possible Galeazzi-equivalent injury), more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up may be warranted 3

Economic and Resource Implications

  • Management with removable splints represents economic and resource savings for healthcare systems compared to casting 1
  • Removable splinting eliminates the need for cast removal visits, reducing healthcare utilization 1, 2

Important Caveats

  • This recommendation applies specifically to stable buckle fractures of the ulnar metaphysis 1
  • More complex fracture patterns, such as displaced fractures or those with associated injuries, may require different management approaches 3
  • If plastic deformation or significant displacement is present, more aggressive treatment may be needed 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.