Management of Asthma in Children
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the preferred first-line treatment for managing asthma in children with mild or moderate persistent asthma. 1
Classification and Initial Assessment
- Children with mild persistent asthma show symptoms more than twice weekly but less than daily, with occasional exacerbations that may affect activity 1
- Children with moderate persistent asthma have daily symptoms, require daily medication, and experience exacerbations that affect activity 1
- Severity assessment should include evaluation of daytime symptoms, nighttime awakenings, activity limitation, and lung function when age-appropriate 1
First-Line Treatment Recommendations
For Children 5 Years and Older:
- Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids are the preferred therapy for mild persistent asthma 1
- Alternative therapies (if ICS cannot be used) include leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), cromolyn, or nedocromil 1
- For moderate persistent asthma, two main options exist:
For Children Under 5 Years:
- Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids are the preferred therapy delivered via nebulizer, dry powder inhaler, or metered-dose inhaler with holding chamber 1
- Alternative therapies include cromolyn or LTRAs (such as montelukast) 1
- Montelukast is FDA-approved for children as young as 2 years of age 1, 2
Evidence Supporting ICS as First-Line Treatment
Strong evidence shows that ICS improve long-term outcomes compared to as-needed beta2-agonists, including:
- Improved lung function (FEV1)
- Reduced airway hyperresponsiveness
- Improved symptom scores
- Fewer courses of oral corticosteroids
- Fewer urgent care visits and hospitalizations 1
Studies comparing ICS to cromolyn, nedocromil, theophylline, or LTRAs show that none of these alternatives are as effective as ICS in improving asthma outcomes 1
In children aged 1-3 years, fluticasone propionate has shown significant dose-related improvements in symptoms and reduction in exacerbations compared to placebo 3
Step-Up Therapy for Inadequate Control
For children whose asthma is not well controlled on low-dose ICS:
A study in children aged 4-11 years showed that fluticasone propionate 200 mcg twice daily provided greater benefits than 100 mcg twice daily, particularly in children with more severe asthma 5
Monitoring and Follow-Up
- Monitor response to therapy carefully, especially in young children 1
- If benefits are sustained for 2-4 months, attempt to step down therapy 1
- If no clear benefits within 4-6 weeks, consider stopping treatment and exploring alternative therapies or diagnoses 1
- Assess inhaler technique regularly to ensure proper medication delivery 1
Special Considerations for Young Children
- Viral respiratory infections are the most common trigger for asthma symptoms in young children 1
- The decision to start long-term control therapy in very young children should weigh the risks of inadequately controlled asthma against potential medication side effects 1
- For children with recurrent wheezing and positive asthma predictive index, early intervention with ICS may reduce morbidity 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Undertreatment is a key problem in pediatric asthma management - inadequate control can lead to permanent airway changes 1, 6
- Not all wheezing and cough in children are caused by asthma - avoid prolonged inappropriate therapy 1
- Growth concerns with ICS are minimal at recommended doses and are outweighed by benefits of asthma control 1, 6
- Theophylline is not recommended for young children with mild persistent asthma due to risk of adverse effects, particularly during febrile illnesses 1
- Children with severe attacks may appear distressed; assessment in very young children can be difficult 1
By following these evidence-based recommendations, clinicians can effectively manage asthma in children while minimizing risks and optimizing outcomes related to morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.