Is Keflex (cephalexin) effective for treating uncomplicated cellulitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Keflex (Cephalexin) for Uncomplicated Cellulitis

Cephalexin (Keflex) is effective as a first-line treatment for uncomplicated cellulitis, with a recommended dosage of 500 mg orally four times daily for 5-7 days. 1, 2

Efficacy and Rationale

  • Cephalexin is FDA-approved for skin and skin structure infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and/or Streptococcus pyogenes, which are the primary pathogens in uncomplicated cellulitis 2
  • The American College of Physicians and Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend cephalexin as a first-line therapy for nonpurulent cellulitis 1
  • Nonpurulent cellulitis is primarily caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci, for which beta-lactams like cephalexin provide appropriate coverage 3, 1
  • A 5-6 day course of antibiotics active against streptococci is recommended for patients with nonpurulent cellulitis who can self-monitor and have close follow-up 3

Dosing and Duration

  • Standard dosing for adults is cephalexin 500 mg orally four times daily 3, 1
  • Recent evidence suggests that a 5-day course is as effective as a 10-day course if clinical improvement occurs within the first 5 days 3, 1
  • A recent pilot study is investigating whether high-dose cephalexin (1000 mg four times daily) may be more effective than standard dosing, with preliminary results showing fewer treatment failures but more minor adverse effects 4

MRSA Considerations

  • MRSA is an unusual cause of typical nonpurulent cellulitis 1, 5
  • Standard beta-lactam therapy with cephalexin is successful in approximately 96% of typical cellulitis cases 1
  • MRSA coverage should be considered only in specific situations:
    • Cellulitis associated with penetrating trauma 3, 1
    • Evidence of MRSA infection elsewhere 1
    • Nasal colonization with MRSA 1
    • Injection drug use 1
    • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome 1
    • Purulent drainage 1, 5

Evidence from Clinical Trials

  • A randomized controlled trial comparing cephalexin alone versus cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (for MRSA coverage) found no significant difference in clinical cure rates for uncomplicated cellulitis (82% vs. 85% in the per-protocol analysis) 6
  • Another randomized trial similarly found no benefit to adding trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to cephalexin for cellulitis treatment (82% cure with cephalexin alone vs. 85% with combination therapy) 7
  • These findings support the use of cephalexin alone for typical nonpurulent cellulitis 6, 7

Adjunctive Measures

  • Elevation of the affected area is recommended to promote drainage of edema and inflammatory substances 1
  • Treatment of underlying conditions that may predispose to infection (e.g., tinea pedis, venous eczema, lymphedema) is important 1
  • For patients with purulent collections, incision and drainage is the primary treatment, with antibiotics as adjunctive therapy 3, 1

Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

  • Inflammation may worsen after initiating therapy due to pathogen destruction releasing enzymes that increase local inflammation 1
  • It is essential to distinguish cellulitis from purulent collections, as the latter requires drainage rather than antibiotics alone 1
  • If no improvement is seen after 48-72 hours of cephalexin therapy, consider alternative diagnoses or the need for MRSA coverage 3, 1
  • For patients with penicillin allergies, clindamycin is an appropriate alternative (300-450 mg orally three times daily) 3, 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.