What does spinal ablation do?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Spinal Ablation: Mechanism, Effectiveness, and Risks

Spinal ablation procedures are not recommended for chronic non-cancer spine pain as they provide little to no benefit over sham procedures while carrying risks of harm and significant costs. 1

What Spinal Ablation Does

Spinal ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses thermal energy to interrupt pain signals by damaging specific nerves that transmit pain from the spine. The primary mechanisms include:

  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses heat generated from alternating current to destroy targeted nerve tissue, causing Wallerian degeneration of the nerve fibers 2
  • The procedure targets specific nerves depending on the pain location:
    • Medial branch nerves for facet joint pain 1
    • Basivertebral nerves for vertebrogenic pain 3
    • Dorsal root ganglion for radicular pain 1

Types of Spinal Ablation

Different techniques are used depending on the clinical situation:

  • Conventional (thermal) radiofrequency ablation: Uses high temperatures (67-80°C) to ablate nerves 1
  • Water-cooled radiofrequency ablation: Used primarily for sacroiliac joint pain 1
  • Cryoablation: Uses extreme cold to damage nerve tissue 1
  • Chemical denervation: Uses agents like phenol or alcohol (not recommended for routine use) 1

Effectiveness for Chronic Pain

Recent high-quality evidence strongly suggests against using spinal ablation for chronic spine pain:

  • For chronic axial spine pain (≥3 months), strong recommendations exist against joint radiofrequency ablation with or without joint-targeted injections 1
  • For chronic radicular spine pain (≥3 months), strong recommendations exist against dorsal root ganglion radiofrequency with or without epidural injections 1
  • Current evidence suggests these procedures are no more effective than sham procedures for chronic spine pain 1

Potential Risks and Harms

Spinal ablation carries various risks that must be considered:

  • Common moderate harms (low to very low certainty evidence):

    • 8.6% risk of prolonged pain or stiffness (>48 hours) 1
    • 2.1% risk of temporary altered level of consciousness 1
    • 1.4% risk of dural puncture 1
    • 0.7% risk of deep infection 1
  • Rare but severe complications:

    • Permanent neurological injury including paralysis (case reports exist) 4
    • Spinal cord injury 1
    • Infection resulting in meningitis 1

Practical Considerations

If considering spinal ablation despite the evidence against it:

  • The effects are temporary due to nerve regeneration capacity, typically lasting 1-2 years 2
  • Procedures are costly (US$1,000-$6,000 per treatment) 1
  • Requires repeated treatments:
    • Injections typically repeated every 2 weeks to 3 months 1
    • Nerve ablation procedures typically repeated every 6 months 1

Current Recommendations

The most recent and highest quality evidence (2025 BMJ guideline) strongly recommends against using interventional procedures including spinal ablation for chronic spine pain:

  • Strong recommendations against joint radiofrequency ablation for chronic axial spine pain 1
  • Strong recommendations against dorsal root ganglion radiofrequency for chronic radicular spine pain 1
  • These recommendations apply to chronic pain (≥3 months) not associated with cancer or inflammatory arthropathy 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Overutilization despite limited evidence: There has been a 131% increase in lumbar radiofrequency procedures from 2007 to 2016 despite limited evidence of effectiveness 1
  • Financial incentives may drive overuse: Substantial reimbursement for these procedures may act as a perverse incentive for their delivery 1
  • Patient selection: The 2010 ASA guidelines note that other treatment modalities should be attempted before consideration of ablative techniques 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.