Spinal Ablation: Mechanism, Effectiveness, and Risks
Spinal ablation procedures are not recommended for chronic non-cancer spine pain as they provide little to no benefit over sham procedures while carrying risks of harm and significant costs. 1
What Spinal Ablation Does
Spinal ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses thermal energy to interrupt pain signals by damaging specific nerves that transmit pain from the spine. The primary mechanisms include:
- Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses heat generated from alternating current to destroy targeted nerve tissue, causing Wallerian degeneration of the nerve fibers 2
- The procedure targets specific nerves depending on the pain location:
Types of Spinal Ablation
Different techniques are used depending on the clinical situation:
- Conventional (thermal) radiofrequency ablation: Uses high temperatures (67-80°C) to ablate nerves 1
- Water-cooled radiofrequency ablation: Used primarily for sacroiliac joint pain 1
- Cryoablation: Uses extreme cold to damage nerve tissue 1
- Chemical denervation: Uses agents like phenol or alcohol (not recommended for routine use) 1
Effectiveness for Chronic Pain
Recent high-quality evidence strongly suggests against using spinal ablation for chronic spine pain:
- For chronic axial spine pain (≥3 months), strong recommendations exist against joint radiofrequency ablation with or without joint-targeted injections 1
- For chronic radicular spine pain (≥3 months), strong recommendations exist against dorsal root ganglion radiofrequency with or without epidural injections 1
- Current evidence suggests these procedures are no more effective than sham procedures for chronic spine pain 1
Potential Risks and Harms
Spinal ablation carries various risks that must be considered:
Common moderate harms (low to very low certainty evidence):
Rare but severe complications:
Practical Considerations
If considering spinal ablation despite the evidence against it:
- The effects are temporary due to nerve regeneration capacity, typically lasting 1-2 years 2
- Procedures are costly (US$1,000-$6,000 per treatment) 1
- Requires repeated treatments:
Current Recommendations
The most recent and highest quality evidence (2025 BMJ guideline) strongly recommends against using interventional procedures including spinal ablation for chronic spine pain:
- Strong recommendations against joint radiofrequency ablation for chronic axial spine pain 1
- Strong recommendations against dorsal root ganglion radiofrequency for chronic radicular spine pain 1
- These recommendations apply to chronic pain (≥3 months) not associated with cancer or inflammatory arthropathy 1
Common Pitfalls
- Overutilization despite limited evidence: There has been a 131% increase in lumbar radiofrequency procedures from 2007 to 2016 despite limited evidence of effectiveness 1
- Financial incentives may drive overuse: Substantial reimbursement for these procedures may act as a perverse incentive for their delivery 1
- Patient selection: The 2010 ASA guidelines note that other treatment modalities should be attempted before consideration of ablative techniques 1