Initial Treatment for Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma
The preferred initial treatment for patients diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma is bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd), which should be offered to both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients. 1
Risk-Stratified Approach to Initial Therapy
Transplant-Eligible Patients
- For transplant-eligible patients, bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred primary therapy option 2
- The VRd regimen has demonstrated high response rates with 58% of patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better after induction therapy 2
- After VRd induction, patients should proceed to high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) with autologous stem cell transplantation 1
- Following transplantation, maintenance therapy with lenalidomide should be continued until disease progression 1
- For high-risk patients (with del 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20)), bortezomib-based maintenance therapy is preferred over lenalidomide alone 1
Transplant-Ineligible Patients
- For standard-risk patients ineligible for transplant, lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) continuously is recommended as initial therapy 2
- For intermediate-risk patients ineligible for transplant, cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) is recommended 2
- For high-risk patients ineligible for transplant, bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd) is recommended until progression 2
- In very elderly or frail patients, melphalan-prednisone (MP) may be considered, reserving novel agents for later use 2
Evidence Supporting VRd as Initial Therapy
- The phase III SWOG S0777 trial demonstrated that VRd significantly improved progression-free survival (43 months vs 30 months) and overall survival (75 months vs 64 months) compared to Rd alone 3
- The VRd regimen showed a 100% overall response rate in phase II studies, with 74% of patients achieving VGPR or better and 52% achieving complete response (CR) or near CR 2
- The addition of daratumumab to VRd has shown promising results in recent studies, with 71% of patients achieving minimal residual disease negativity 4
Alternative Initial Therapy Options
- Bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a category 1 option for transplant-eligible patients, with a 94% response rate 2
- Bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd or CyBorD) has shown high response rates (88%) with 61% VGPR or better 2
- For transplant-ineligible patients, melphalan/prednisone/bortezomib (MPV) is recommended for high-risk patients 2
- Melphalan/prednisone/thalidomide (MPT) is an option for standard-risk transplant-ineligible patients 2
Administration Considerations
- Subcutaneous administration is the preferred route for bortezomib, as it significantly reduces peripheral neuropathy compared to intravenous administration 2
- Weekly bortezomib dosing (rather than twice weekly) reduces neuropathy while maintaining efficacy 2
- For daratumumab-containing regimens, either intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection may be used, except in patients with significant thrombocytopenia 2
- Thromboprophylaxis is essential for patients on immunomodulatory drugs like lenalidomide 1
Monitoring and Response Assessment
- Response should be assessed with each treatment cycle using serum and urine electrophoresis 1
- Complete response requires <5% plasma cells in bone marrow and negative immunofixation 1
- Whole-body low-dose CT is preferred over conventional skeletal survey for bone assessment 1
Common Complications and Management
- Peripheral neuropathy is a common side effect of bortezomib and requires dose modification or switching to subcutaneous administration 5
- Thrombotic events are associated with immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide) and require thromboprophylaxis 2
- Carfilzomib can potentially cause cardiac, renal, and pulmonary toxicities requiring careful monitoring 2
- Infusion-related reactions are common with daratumumab and require appropriate pre-medication 6
By following this risk-adapted approach to initial therapy for symptomatic multiple myeloma, clinicians can optimize outcomes while minimizing treatment-related toxicities.