Combined Ileostomy Closure and Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
Ileostomy closure and abdominal wall hernia repair can be safely performed together as a combined procedure in most patients, which reduces the need for multiple surgeries and decreases overall morbidity. 1
Patient Selection Criteria
- Combined procedure is appropriate when there is no active infection, inflammation, or intestinal strangulation requiring emergency intervention 1
- Evaluate local tissue conditions, including absence of active infection at either site before proceeding with combined approach 1
- Higher risk patients for hernia development (those with malignancy or diabetes) may particularly benefit from the combined approach with mesh reinforcement 2
Surgical Technique Recommendations
For midline abdominal wall hernia repair combined with ileostomy closure:
- Use continuous suture technique for fascial closure as it is faster with equivalent outcomes 1
- Employ mass closure rather than layered closure for speed and equivalent outcomes 1
- Maintain a suture-to-wound length ratio of at least 4:1 for continuous closure 1
- Use small bite technique to prevent incisional hernia and wound complications 1
Mesh selection based on surgical field classification:
- For clean surgical fields (CDC wound class I) - synthetic mesh is recommended 3, 1
- For clean-contaminated fields (CDC wound class II) - synthetic mesh can still be used safely 3
- For contaminated or dirty fields (CDC wound classes III and IV) - primary repair for small defects (<3 cm), biological mesh for larger defects 3
Consider component separation technique for large midline abdominal wall hernias 3, 1
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
- For clean cases with no bowel ischemia, short-term prophylaxis is recommended 1, 4
- For cases with intestinal strangulation and/or concurrent bowel resection, 48-hour antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended 1, 4
- Full antimicrobial therapy is required for cases with peritonitis 3
Potential Complications and Management
- Monitor for stomal stenosis during closure of large abdominal wall defects, as gradual closure techniques may deform the abdominal wall 5
- Prophylactic mesh placement at the ileostomy closure site significantly reduces incisional hernia rates (from 36.1% to 6.4%) without increasing wound infection rates 2
- If primary fascial closure is not possible due to tension, consider progressive closure techniques or temporary abdominal closure with negative pressure wound therapy 6
- When definitive fascial closure cannot be achieved, a skin-only closure is viable with subsequent repair of the eventration at a later stage 3
Risk Factors for Post-Closure Complications
- Patient factors are more predictive of hernia development than surgical technique 7
- Major risk factors for incisional hernia following ileostomy closure: