Is mebendazole (antiparasitic medication) effective as a treatment for cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mebendazole is Not Recommended for Cancer Treatment

Mebendazole is not recommended as a treatment for cancer as it is not included in any major cancer treatment guidelines and lacks sufficient clinical evidence to support its use in oncology. 1

Current Status of Mebendazole in Cancer Treatment

  • Mebendazole is an antiparasitic medication approved for treating various helminthic infections including pinworm, whipworm, ascariasis, and trichinellosis, but is not approved for any cancer indication 1
  • The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines do not include mebendazole as a recommended therapy for any type of cancer 1
  • The European Society for Medical Oncology recommends prioritizing standard of care treatments (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) over experimental approaches like mebendazole 1

Preclinical Evidence vs. Clinical Reality

  • Despite promising preclinical studies showing potential anticancer effects through mechanisms such as:

    • Microtubule disruption and tubulin polymerization inhibition 2
    • Inhibition of angiogenesis 3
    • Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction 4
    • Targeting of signaling pathways related to cancer progression 4
  • Clinical evidence remains extremely limited:

    • A phase 2a clinical study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer showed that all patients experienced rapid disease progression despite mebendazole treatment, with some meeting criteria for hyperprogression 5
    • Only a single case report has shown long-term disease control (19 months of stability) in a patient with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma, but the disease ultimately progressed 6

Standard of Care Cancer Treatments

  • For cancer treatment, guidelines recommend established therapies with proven efficacy:
    • Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens specific to cancer type 7
    • Targeted therapies based on molecular profiling 7
    • Immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors for appropriate indications 7
    • Hormone therapies for hormone-responsive cancers 7

Safety Considerations

  • While mebendazole has a generally favorable safety profile at standard antiparasitic doses, cancer treatment would require much higher doses:
    • The phase 2a study used doses up to 4g/day (40 times the standard antiparasitic dose) 5
    • Only half of the patients in the clinical study reached the target serum concentration despite high dosing 5
    • Long-term safety at these high doses has not been established 5

Recommendations for Cancer Patients

  • Patients should adhere to evidence-based standard of care treatments appropriate for their specific cancer type and stage 7
  • Treatment decisions should be based on comprehensive molecular profiling when appropriate to identify targeted therapy options 7
  • Clinical trials should be considered when standard therapies have been exhausted 7
  • Patients interested in mebendazole should be counseled that:
    • Current evidence does not support its use outside of clinical trials 1, 5
    • Using unproven therapies may delay effective treatment and potentially worsen outcomes 1
    • Any experimental treatment should be discussed with and monitored by their oncologist 1

Future Research Directions

  • Further investigation of mebendazole in cancer may focus on:
    • Combination approaches with standard therapies 3
    • Development of more potent derivatives or prodrug formulations 5
    • Identification of specific molecular features that might predict response 4
    • Properly designed clinical trials with appropriate endpoints 5

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.