The Attending Physician Has Final Authority for Patient Discharge from Rehabilitation
The attending physician has the final authority and responsibility for determining when a patient is ready for discharge from rehabilitation, although this decision should be made in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team, including physical therapists. 1
Decision-Making Authority in Rehabilitation Discharge
- The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guidelines strongly recommend that once a patient is medically stable, the primary physician should consult rehabilitation services to assess rehabilitation needs and recommend the most appropriate setting 2
- The attending physician is ultimately responsible for documenting medical necessity criteria for inpatient rehabilitation and making the final discharge decision 1
- While physical therapists provide critical assessment of functional status and rehabilitation progress, they serve in an advisory capacity to the attending physician 2
- The multidisciplinary rehabilitation team should provide coordinated input, but the attending physician integrates this information to make the final medical determination 1
Collaborative Approach to Discharge Planning
- A formal rehabilitation assessment by clinicians with expertise in rehabilitation should be conducted and documented for all patients before discharge 2
- Activities of daily living, communication abilities, and functional mobility should be evaluated by appropriate rehabilitation professionals to inform the physician's decision 2
- The physical therapist's assessment of the patient's functional status, strength, endurance, and safety is a crucial component of the discharge decision-making process 2
- Weekly multidisciplinary team meetings to discuss patient discharge timing improve functional outcomes 1
Common Pitfalls in Discharge Decision-Making
- Lack of communication between physicians and rehabilitation professionals can lead to disagreements about discharge readiness 3
- Studies show that patients and clinicians frequently disagree about when and where a patient will go after hospitalization, particularly for those discharged to skilled nursing facilities 3
- Financial considerations often become significant drivers of discharge decisions, which may conflict with clinical recommendations 4
- Delaying transfer to rehabilitation or discharge from rehabilitation when a patient is medically stable can lead to unnecessary costs, delayed functional recovery, and increased risk of hospital-acquired complications 1
Best Practices for Discharge Decision-Making
- The attending physician should document the medical necessity for continued rehabilitation or readiness for discharge in the medical record 2
- Explicit discharge criteria for patients should be established early in the rehabilitation course to mitigate variation in discharge practices 1
- Patient and family preferences should be considered in the discharge decision, but the attending physician must ensure the plan is medically appropriate 5
- Early supported discharge with home-based rehabilitation programs has been shown to be cost-effective for appropriate patients and should be considered when medically appropriate 1
Resolving Disagreements About Discharge Readiness
- When disagreements arise between the attending physician and physical therapist regarding discharge readiness, a structured discussion focusing on objective functional measures should occur 2
- If consensus cannot be reached, the attending physician's medical judgment prevails, as they bear ultimate responsibility for the patient's care 1
- Documentation of the clinical reasoning for the discharge decision is essential, particularly when there are differing opinions among the care team 2
- In cases of significant disagreement, involvement of the rehabilitation medical director or department chair may be appropriate to ensure the best patient outcome 1