How long can the Lyme enzyme immunoassay (EIA) stay positive after treatment for Lyme disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Duration of Lyme Enzyme Immunoassay Positivity After Treatment

Antibodies to B. burgdorferi often persist for months to years after successful treatment of Lyme disease, and should not be used as a marker of active infection. 1

Persistence of Serologic Markers

  • Antibodies against B. burgdorferi typically persist for months to years after successfully treated or untreated infection, making seroreactivity alone unsuitable as a marker of active disease 1
  • In patients treated for early Lyme disease, antibody levels decline over time but can remain detectable for more than a year after treatment 2
  • Studies show that in children followed for up to 20 months after treatment, 18% still had IgM antibodies and 6% had IgG antibodies by ELISA 2

Factors Affecting Antibody Persistence

  • The peak antibody response typically occurs 8-12 days into treatment, with approximately 80% of patients showing positive results at this time 3
  • Antibody persistence varies based on:
    • Disease stage at time of treatment (early vs. late) 1
    • Type of antibody (IgM vs. IgG) 2
    • Individual immune response 3
  • Approximately 20% of patients with documented early Lyme disease may remain seronegative throughout follow-up despite clinical infection 3

Clinical Implications

  • Neither positive serologic test results nor a history of previous Lyme disease ensures that a person has protective immunity; repeated infection with B. burgdorferi has been reported 1
  • The presence of persistent antibodies should not be confused with persistent infection 4
  • Serologic testing should not be used to determine treatment success or failure 4
  • Clinical response should be the primary determinant of treatment success, not serologic findings 4, 5

Distinguishing Persistent Antibodies from Active Infection

  • Objective clinical manifestations are uncommon after appropriate treatment of Lyme disease 1
  • Subjective symptoms (arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue) may persist for weeks to months after treatment due to slow resolution of the inflammatory process, not persistent infection 1
  • In patients treated for early Lyme disease, subjective symptoms were present in 35% at day 20,24% at 3 months, and 17% at 12 months 1
  • PCR positivity after treatment should not be interpreted as evidence of ongoing infection without corresponding clinical symptoms and other supporting evidence 4

Common Pitfalls in Interpretation

  • Misinterpreting persistent antibodies as evidence of treatment failure or ongoing infection 1, 4
  • Using serologic testing to monitor treatment response 4
  • Failing to recognize that positive Lyme disease test results may have poor positive predictive value in low-prevalence regions (fewer than 20% of positive tests represent clinically likely Lyme disease in such settings) 6
  • Prescribing prolonged or repeated courses of antibiotics based solely on persistent seropositivity without objective evidence of active infection 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The outcome of Lyme borreliosis in children.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 1999

Guideline

Duration of Lyme PCR Positivity After Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Untreated Lyme Disease Diagnosed Through Bloodwork

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Poor Positive Predictive Value of Lyme Disease Serologic Testing in an Area of Low Disease Incidence.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.