Duration of Lyme Enzyme Immunoassay Positivity After Treatment
Antibodies to B. burgdorferi often persist for months to years after successful treatment of Lyme disease, and should not be used as a marker of active infection. 1
Persistence of Serologic Markers
- Antibodies against B. burgdorferi typically persist for months to years after successfully treated or untreated infection, making seroreactivity alone unsuitable as a marker of active disease 1
- In patients treated for early Lyme disease, antibody levels decline over time but can remain detectable for more than a year after treatment 2
- Studies show that in children followed for up to 20 months after treatment, 18% still had IgM antibodies and 6% had IgG antibodies by ELISA 2
Factors Affecting Antibody Persistence
- The peak antibody response typically occurs 8-12 days into treatment, with approximately 80% of patients showing positive results at this time 3
- Antibody persistence varies based on:
- Approximately 20% of patients with documented early Lyme disease may remain seronegative throughout follow-up despite clinical infection 3
Clinical Implications
- Neither positive serologic test results nor a history of previous Lyme disease ensures that a person has protective immunity; repeated infection with B. burgdorferi has been reported 1
- The presence of persistent antibodies should not be confused with persistent infection 4
- Serologic testing should not be used to determine treatment success or failure 4
- Clinical response should be the primary determinant of treatment success, not serologic findings 4, 5
Distinguishing Persistent Antibodies from Active Infection
- Objective clinical manifestations are uncommon after appropriate treatment of Lyme disease 1
- Subjective symptoms (arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue) may persist for weeks to months after treatment due to slow resolution of the inflammatory process, not persistent infection 1
- In patients treated for early Lyme disease, subjective symptoms were present in 35% at day 20,24% at 3 months, and 17% at 12 months 1
- PCR positivity after treatment should not be interpreted as evidence of ongoing infection without corresponding clinical symptoms and other supporting evidence 4
Common Pitfalls in Interpretation
- Misinterpreting persistent antibodies as evidence of treatment failure or ongoing infection 1, 4
- Using serologic testing to monitor treatment response 4
- Failing to recognize that positive Lyme disease test results may have poor positive predictive value in low-prevalence regions (fewer than 20% of positive tests represent clinically likely Lyme disease in such settings) 6
- Prescribing prolonged or repeated courses of antibiotics based solely on persistent seropositivity without objective evidence of active infection 7