Which of the following is not a criterion for LINX (Lower Esophageal Sphincter augmentation device) insertion system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Criteria for LINX Insertion System

BMI below 40 is not a criterion for LINX insertion system.

Understanding LINX Device Criteria

The LINX Reflux Management System is a magnetic sphincter augmentation device used for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The following are established criteria for LINX insertion:

Confirmed Criteria for LINX Placement

  • No prior esophageal or gastric surgery - Previous surgeries in these areas are contraindications for LINX placement 1
  • No allergies to iron, stainless steel, or titanium - Since the device is made of these materials, allergies would contraindicate placement 1
  • No paresophageal hernia - The presence of a paresophageal hernia would prevent proper placement and function of the device 2, 3

BMI Considerations

  • BMI below 40 is not specifically mentioned as a criterion in the available literature on LINX placement
  • The LINX procedure has been performed successfully in patients with various BMI ranges without specific upper limits being mentioned in the guidelines 2, 4

Procedural Aspects of LINX Placement

Standard Approach

  • Typically performed via laparoscopic approach as a minimally invasive procedure 2
  • The device is placed around the gastroesophageal junction 3
  • Procedure is considered technically simpler than traditional Nissen fundoplication 4

Alternative Approaches

  • Left transthoracic approach may be used in patients with previous abdominal surgeries that prohibit a transabdominal approach 5
  • Robotic approach is also possible but has been associated with longer operative times and higher costs without superior outcomes compared to laparoscopic approach 4

Effectiveness and Safety

  • LINX implantation has demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in treating GERD in several studies 2, 3
  • Most common adverse effect is dysphagia, which is typically self-limiting 2
  • Other gastrointestinal side effects commonly seen after laparoscopic fundoplication (bloating, gas, inability to belch) may be less common after LINX 3
  • Significant decrease in major GERD complaints has been reported: heartburn (96% to 22%), bloating (70% to 30%), respiratory complaints (57% to 17%), and sleep disturbance (65% to 4%) 2

Important Considerations

  • Patient selection is critical for successful outcomes 3
  • LINX should be considered for selected GERD patients without significant anatomic or motility defects 3
  • The procedure is standardized, technically simple, safe, and well-tolerated 2
  • Long-term safety and efficacy of LINX compared to current GERD therapies remains to be fully determined 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.