What is the recommended management for a pediatric patient with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) and a Systemic Ventricular Assist Device (SVAD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Pediatric Patients with HLHS and SVAD

For pediatric patients with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS) and a Systemic Ventricular Assist Device (SVAD), anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as rivaroxaban or dabigatran is recommended over standard-of-care anticoagulants to reduce thrombus recurrence and improve outcomes. 1

Anticoagulation Management

Primary Anticoagulation Strategy

  • DOACs (rivaroxaban or dabigatran) are preferred over standard-of-care anticoagulants (LMWH, UFH, VKAs, fondaparinux) due to reduced thrombus recurrence rates and improved thrombus resolution 1
  • Either rivaroxaban or dabigatran can be used, though individual factors may influence the choice between these agents 1
  • When selecting between rivaroxaban and dabigatran, consider that dabigatran has more reported gastrointestinal side effects 1

Special Considerations for HLHS with SVAD

  • Patients with HLHS on SVAD are at high risk for thrombotic complications and require vigilant anticoagulation monitoring 2
  • For patients with hemodynamic compromise due to thrombosis, thrombolysis followed by anticoagulation should be considered rather than anticoagulation alone 1
  • Antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy should be considered in addition to standard anticoagulation if the patient fails to respond clinically to standard anticoagulation and has low AT levels based on age-appropriate reference ranges 1

CVAD Management in HLHS Patients with SVAD

CVAD Retention vs. Removal

  • For functioning CVADs with symptomatic CVAD-related thrombosis, maintain the CVAD if venous access is still required 1
  • Remove non-functioning or unneeded CVADs in patients with symptomatic CVAD-related thrombosis 1
  • For patients requiring CVAD removal, delay removal until after initiation of anticoagulation (typically a few days) to reduce risk of emboli leading to PE or paradoxical stroke 1

Management of Thrombotic Complications

  • For worsening signs or symptoms of CVAD-related thrombosis despite anticoagulation, consider CVAD removal if alternative venous access is available 1
  • For patients with PE and hemodynamic compromise, thrombolysis followed by anticoagulation is recommended rather than anticoagulation alone 1
  • Avoid thrombectomy followed by anticoagulation in favor of anticoagulation alone unless there is cardiovascular compromise secondary to the thrombosis 1

Comprehensive Management Approach

Surgical and Interventional Considerations

  • For high-risk HLHS patients with major cardiac risk factors, a hybrid approach (bilateral pulmonary bands, PDA stent placement, and atrial septectomy if needed) combined with SVAD can be considered as a bridge to transplantation 3
  • The hybrid approach minimizes comorbidities of HLHS stage I palliation such as small patient size, ventricular dysfunction, and multisystem organ failure 1
  • Retrograde aortic arch obstruction with fully open PDA is a contraindication to the hybrid stage I palliation due to potential acute obstruction to coronary flow 1

Monitoring and Follow-up

  • Regular assessment for thrombotic complications, including daily neurological assessment for patients with severe symptoms 4
  • Monitor for signs of in-stent stenosis of PDA stent or development of retrograde coarctation, which may be heralded by deterioration in right ventricular pressure or increasing tricuspid regurgitation 1
  • Close observation for restenosis of the atrial septum is necessary in hybrid-palliated HLHS patients 1

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Failing to distinguish between superficial and deep vein thrombosis, which have different management approaches 5
  • Inadequate follow-up that might miss progression to more serious thrombosis 5
  • Overtreatment with anticoagulation for uncomplicated superficial thrombosis, exposing patients to unnecessary bleeding risk 5
  • Immediate removal of thrombosed vascular access without prior anticoagulation, increasing the risk of embolization 6
  • Underestimating the risk of thrombotic complications in HLHS patients with SVAD despite therapeutic anticoagulation 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Progressive Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Superficial Thrombus in the Cephalic Vein

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Manejo de la Fístula Arteriovenosa Trombosada

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.