Treatment Selection Between Anti-TNF Agents and Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis
For patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, vedolizumab is recommended over anti-TNF agents, particularly in patients who have failed prior anti-TNF therapy, due to its superior efficacy and better safety profile.
First-Line Therapy Selection
Biologic-Naïve Patients
- For biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC, higher efficacy medications including infliximab and vedolizumab are preferred over lower efficacy options like adalimumab 1
- Infliximab appears superior to vedolizumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and ozanimod in biologic-naïve patients 1
- The AGA suggests using infliximab or vedolizumab over adalimumab for biologic-naïve patients with UC 1
- All biologic agents (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab) are effective compared to placebo for induction and maintenance of remission 1
Safety Considerations
- Vedolizumab demonstrates a 32% lower risk of serious infections compared to TNF antagonists in patients with UC 1
- Vedolizumab has a more favorable safety profile than anti-TNF therapy due to its gut-selective mechanism of action 2
- JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib) have restricted use in biologic-naïve patients and should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular risk factors 1
After Anti-TNF Failure
Primary Anti-TNF Failure
- In patients with primary failure to an anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab is strongly recommended over switching to another anti-TNF therapy 1
- For patients who have failed anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab is strongly recommended to induce complete corticosteroid-free remission 3
Secondary Anti-TNF Failure
- In patients with secondary failure to an anti-TNF therapy, switching to another anti-TNF therapy or vedolizumab is recommended based on therapeutic drug monitoring results 1
- After failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF agent (adalimumab or golimumab), patients treated with vedolizumab achieved higher clinical remission rates (49%) compared to those treated with infliximab (26%) 4
- In biologic-exposed patients, particularly after TNF antagonist failure, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab appear superior to vedolizumab 1
Efficacy Considerations
Induction of Remission
- Vedolizumab has demonstrated significant efficacy for both induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis 3
- In a head-to-head trial comparing vedolizumab vs adalimumab, clinical remission rates were significantly higher in vedolizumab-treated patients (34.2% vs 24.3%) 3
- The kinetic of response with vedolizumab appears to be slower compared to anti-TNF-alpha antibodies 2
Maintenance of Remission
- Vedolizumab shows deep and sustained remission in patients initially responding to induction therapy with a lower loss of efficacy in long-term treatment compared to anti-TNF therapy 2
- In patients who respond to vedolizumab induction, continued vedolizumab therapy is strongly recommended to maintain complete corticosteroid-free remission 1
Monitoring and Assessment
- Patients should be evaluated for lack of symptomatic response to anti-TNF induction therapy in 8-12 weeks to determine the need to modify therapy 1
- For vedolizumab, assessment of response should occur between 8-14 weeks after initiation 1, 3
- In patients with suboptimal response to anti-TNF induction therapy, dose intensification is recommended 1
- Therapeutic drug monitoring should inform dose optimization for patients with UC on anti-TNF therapy 1
Combination Therapy Considerations
- When starting anti-TNF therapy, it is recommended to combine it with a thiopurine or methotrexate rather than using it as monotherapy 1
- For vedolizumab, concomitant treatment with immunomodulators does not substantially affect its efficacy 1
Clinical Decision Algorithm
For biologic-naïve patients:
For patients with prior anti-TNF failure:
For patients with high risk of infections or malignancies:
For maintenance therapy after successful induction: