Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The AEGEAN Trial Approach
Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the preferred treatment approach for resectable stage II-IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on the AEGEAN trial, which demonstrated significantly improved event-free survival and pathological complete response rates compared to chemotherapy alone. 1
AEGEAN Trial Results and Implications
The AEGEAN trial was a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating durvalumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) plus platinum-based chemotherapy before surgery, followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with resectable stage II-IIIB NSCLC 2, 1
Key findings from the AEGEAN trial showed:
- Significantly longer event-free survival with durvalumab compared to placebo (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.88; P = 0.004) 1
- Higher pathological complete response rate with durvalumab (17.2% vs. 4.3%; difference of 13.0 percentage points; P<0.001) 1
- Benefits observed regardless of disease stage and PD-L1 expression levels 1
- Similar safety profile between durvalumab and placebo arms (grade 3-4 adverse events: 42.4% vs. 43.2%) 1
Treatment Algorithm for Resectable NSCLC
Initial Assessment and Staging
- Complete history including smoking history, comorbidities, weight loss, performance status, and physical examination 3
- Contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and upper abdomen for initial imaging 3
- PET-CT scan for mediastinal lymph nodes and distant metastasis assessment 3
- Brain imaging (preferably MRI) for patients eligible for loco-regional treatment 3
- Pathological confirmation of suspect nodes via needle aspiration under endobronchial/endoscopic ultrasound guidance 3
Treatment Approach Based on Stage
For Resectable Stage II-IIIB NSCLC:
- First choice: Perioperative approach with durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (4 cycles) before surgery, followed by adjuvant durvalumab for 12 cycles 1
- The perioperative immunotherapy approach combines the benefits of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies to improve long-term outcomes 1
For Stage I NSCLC:
- Anatomical resection (lobectomy) is preferred over lesser resections 3
- For patients unfit for surgery, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the non-surgical treatment of choice 3
- Sub-lobar resection may be considered for pure ground-glass opacity lesions or adenocarcinomas in situ 3
For Locally Advanced Stage III (Unresectable):
- Definitive concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the preferred treatment 3
- Cisplatin-based regimens (e.g., cisplatin-etoposide or cisplatin-vinorelbine) delivered concurrently with radiotherapy are recommended 3
For Stage IV Disease:
- Two-drug, platinum-based chemotherapy combined with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a taxane for patients with good performance status 3
- For non-squamous tumors, cisplatin should be the treatment of choice 3
- Pemetrexed is preferred to gemcitabine in patients with non-squamous tumors 3
Special Considerations
EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC
- For patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy in the adjuvant setting 4
- First-line treatment with a TKI (erlotinib or gefitinib) should be prescribed to patients with tumors bearing an activating EGFR mutation 3
Performance Status Considerations
- For patients with PS 2, single-agent chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or taxanes represents an option, though platinum-based combinations may also be considered 3
- Poor PS (3-4) patients should be offered best supportive care in the absence of tumors with activating EGFR mutations 3
Follow-Up Recommendations
- Follow-up visits every 3-6 months during the first 2-3 years, then annually thereafter 3
- History and physical examination, chest CT, and to a lesser extent, chest X-ray are appropriate follow-up tools 3
- Smoking cessation should be offered to all patients, as this leads to superior treatment outcomes 3
Caveats and Pitfalls
- Patients with documented EGFR or ALK alterations were excluded from the efficacy analyses in the AEGEAN trial, so the perioperative durvalumab approach may not be optimal for these patients 1
- Despite improvements in diagnosis and therapy, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer remains challenging, requiring a multidisciplinary team approach 5, 6
- Careful assessment of cardiac and pulmonary function is necessary before considering surgical resection to estimate risk of operative morbidity 3