How to Interpret a FibroScan (Transient Elastography) Test Result
FibroScan results should be interpreted based on established cutoff values measured in kilopascals (kPa), with <8.0 kPa indicating minimal fibrosis, 8.0-12.0 kPa suggesting significant fibrosis, and >12.0 kPa indicating advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. 1
Understanding FibroScan Measurements
FibroScan (transient elastography) is a non-invasive tool that measures liver stiffness to assess the degree of fibrosis. The results are reported in kilopascals (kPa) and correspond to different stages of liver fibrosis:
- <8.0 kPa: Low risk for clinically significant fibrosis (F0-F1); recommended surveillance testing in 2-3 years 1
- 8.0-12.0 kPa: Intermediate risk, suggesting significant fibrosis (≥F2-F3) 1
- >12.0 kPa: High risk for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4); referral to hepatology recommended 1
Technical Considerations for Valid Results
For reliable FibroScan interpretation, ensure:
- At least 10 successful measurements were obtained 2, 3
- Success rate is at least 60% of attempted measurements 2, 3
- Interquartile range (IQR) is less than 30% of the median value 1, 3
- Patient fasted for at least 4 hours before the test (postprandial state can falsely increase readings) 1, 4
Disease-Specific Interpretation
Different liver diseases may require slightly different cutoff values:
Chronic Hepatitis C
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
- F2 (significant fibrosis): 8.2 kPa (rounded to 8.0 kPa for clinical use) 1, 2
- F3-F4 (advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis): >12.0 kPa 1
Autoimmune Hepatitis
Factors That May Affect Results
Be aware of factors that can lead to falsely elevated readings:
- Acute hepatitis or significant inflammation (elevated ALT) 1, 6
- Recent food intake (postprandial state) 1, 4
- Right heart failure or liver congestion 1
- Extrahepatic cholestasis 1, 6
- Obesity (consider using XL probe for BMI >30) 6
Clinical Application Algorithm
Initial Assessment:
Sequential Testing:
Result Interpretation:
Follow-up Recommendations:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying on a single measurement when values are borderline (8-12 kPa) 4
- Failing to account for ALT levels when interpreting results 1, 6
- Not considering the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in the target population when interpreting results 1
- Using inappropriate cutoffs for specific liver diseases 1, 5, 7
- Interpreting results without considering clinical context and other laboratory findings 8