How to interpret a FibroScan (Fibrosis Scan) test result?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Interpret a FibroScan (Transient Elastography) Test Result

FibroScan results should be interpreted based on established cutoff values measured in kilopascals (kPa), with <8.0 kPa indicating minimal fibrosis, 8.0-12.0 kPa suggesting significant fibrosis, and >12.0 kPa indicating advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. 1

Understanding FibroScan Measurements

FibroScan (transient elastography) is a non-invasive tool that measures liver stiffness to assess the degree of fibrosis. The results are reported in kilopascals (kPa) and correspond to different stages of liver fibrosis:

  • <8.0 kPa: Low risk for clinically significant fibrosis (F0-F1); recommended surveillance testing in 2-3 years 1
  • 8.0-12.0 kPa: Intermediate risk, suggesting significant fibrosis (≥F2-F3) 1
  • >12.0 kPa: High risk for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4); referral to hepatology recommended 1

Technical Considerations for Valid Results

For reliable FibroScan interpretation, ensure:

  • At least 10 successful measurements were obtained 2, 3
  • Success rate is at least 60% of attempted measurements 2, 3
  • Interquartile range (IQR) is less than 30% of the median value 1, 3
  • Patient fasted for at least 4 hours before the test (postprandial state can falsely increase readings) 1, 4

Disease-Specific Interpretation

Different liver diseases may require slightly different cutoff values:

Chronic Hepatitis C

  • F2 (significant fibrosis): >7.0 kPa 1
  • F3 (advanced fibrosis): 10.0 kPa 1
  • F4 (cirrhosis): >13.0 kPa 1

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

  • F2 (significant fibrosis): 8.2 kPa (rounded to 8.0 kPa for clinical use) 1, 2
  • F3-F4 (advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis): >12.0 kPa 1

Autoimmune Hepatitis

  • F2: 6.27 kPa 5
  • F3: 8.18 kPa 5
  • F4: 12.67 kPa 5

Factors That May Affect Results

Be aware of factors that can lead to falsely elevated readings:

  • Acute hepatitis or significant inflammation (elevated ALT) 1, 6
  • Recent food intake (postprandial state) 1, 4
  • Right heart failure or liver congestion 1
  • Extrahepatic cholestasis 1, 6
  • Obesity (consider using XL probe for BMI >30) 6

Clinical Application Algorithm

  1. Initial Assessment:

    • Begin with simple fibrosis scores like FIB-4 or APRI for initial risk stratification 1, 2
    • FIB-4 <1.3 reliably excludes advanced fibrosis 2
    • FIB-4 >2.67 indicates high risk for advanced fibrosis 2
  2. Sequential Testing:

    • For patients with indeterminate FIB-4 scores (1.3-2.67), proceed to FibroScan 1, 2
    • Sequential testing using FIB-4 followed by FibroScan is more accurate than either test alone 1, 3
  3. Result Interpretation:

    • <8.0 kPa: Low risk, monitor with repeat testing in 2-3 years 1
    • 8.0-12.0 kPa: Intermediate risk, consider more frequent monitoring (annually) 3
    • 12.0 kPa: High risk, refer to hepatology for consideration of liver biopsy or additional testing 1

  4. Follow-up Recommendations:

    • Consider repeating FibroScan after 6 months in patients with borderline elevated values to confirm results 4
    • Weight loss of ≥1 kg can significantly reduce liver stiffness measurements 4
    • Increased physical activity can also improve liver stiffness measurements 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying on a single measurement when values are borderline (8-12 kPa) 4
  • Failing to account for ALT levels when interpreting results 1, 6
  • Not considering the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in the target population when interpreting results 1
  • Using inappropriate cutoffs for specific liver diseases 1, 5, 7
  • Interpreting results without considering clinical context and other laboratory findings 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

FibroScan for Grade 2 Fatty Liver Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Mild Liver Fibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

When the liver gets stiff, the tough get moving.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020

Research

Transient Elastography (FibroScan) Performs Better Than Non-Invasive Markers in Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Autoimmune Hepatitis Patients.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017

Research

Liver fibrosis assessment by FibroScan compared with pathological findings of liver resection specimen in hepatitis C infection.

Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, 2017

Research

Transient elastography (FibroScan).

Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.