Are IL-23 (Interleukin-23) inhibitors, such as risankizumab (Risankizumab) and ustekinumab (Ustekinumab), effective in treating ankylosing spondylitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

IL-23 Inhibitors Lack Efficacy in Ankylosing Spondylitis

IL-23 inhibitors have not demonstrated efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis and cannot be recommended for this condition, despite their effectiveness in other inflammatory conditions like psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. 1

Evidence Against IL-23 Inhibitor Use in Ankylosing Spondylitis

  • Multiple clinical trials have shown that IL-23 inhibitors (including risankizumab and ustekinumab) lack efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis, suggesting that IL-23 may not be a relevant driver of disease pathogenesis in axial spondyloarthritis 1, 2
  • The 2022 GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) guidelines specifically state that "IL-12/23 inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors have not demonstrated efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis" 1
  • A randomized controlled trial of risankizumab in ankylosing spondylitis failed to meet its primary endpoint, with no evidence of clinically meaningful improvements compared to placebo 2
  • A systematic review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations confirmed that inhibitors of IL-23 and IL-12/23 demonstrated no efficacy in axial spondyloarthritis 1

Contrasting Evidence in Other Conditions

  • IL-23 inhibitors have shown efficacy in other inflammatory conditions:
    • Risankizumab, guselkumab, and tildrakizumab have demonstrated effectiveness for psoriatic arthritis, particularly for dactylitis 1
    • These agents are strongly recommended for skin psoriasis 1
    • Risankizumab has been approved for Crohn's disease, and mirikizumab for ulcerative colitis 1

Conflicting Evidence from Post-hoc Analyses

  • Some post-hoc analyses from trials of ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis who had axial symptoms suggest these agents might improve back pain 1, 3
  • However, these improvements could reflect changes in other disease domains rather than true axial disease improvement 1, 3
  • The evidence is considered "too limited and conflicting" to recommend IL-23 inhibitors for axial disease even in psoriatic arthritis 1

Recommended Treatments for Ankylosing Spondylitis

  • For patients with ankylosing spondylitis who have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs, the following therapies have demonstrated efficacy:
    • TNF inhibitors (including golimumab, adalimumab, infliximab) are strongly recommended 1, 4
    • IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab) have shown efficacy and are approved for axial spondyloarthritis 1
    • JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib) have demonstrated efficacy in phase II and III trials 1

Clinical Implications and Management Algorithm

For patients with ankylosing spondylitis:

  1. First-line: NSAIDs, physiotherapy, and/or sacroiliac joint glucocorticoid injections when appropriate 1
  2. If inadequate response to first-line therapy:
    • TNF inhibitors or IL-17 inhibitors should be the preferred biologic agents 1
    • JAK inhibitors can be considered as alternative options 1
  3. Do not use IL-23 inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis due to lack of efficacy 1, 2, 3

Special Considerations

  • In patients with both Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis, a dual-targeted approach might be necessary (e.g., an IL-23 inhibitor for intestinal disease and a TNF inhibitor for axial disease) 5
  • The lack of efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis, despite their effectiveness in psoriatic arthritis, highlights the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these related but different conditions 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.