What is the diagnostic approach for pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Approach for Pulmonary Embolism

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) requires a structured approach using clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and appropriate imaging studies, as PE cannot be accurately diagnosed based on signs, symptoms, and history alone. 1

Initial Risk Stratification

  • Begin with clinical probability assessment using either validated prediction rules or clinical gestalt to categorize patients into low, intermediate, or high probability of PE 1
  • For patients with suspected high-risk PE (presenting with shock or hypotension), echocardiography is the most useful initial test to detect signs of right ventricular overload 1
  • In hemodynamically stable patients (non-high-risk PE), use structured assessment tools like Wells score or clinical judgment to determine pre-test probability 1

Low Clinical Probability Patients

  • Apply the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) for patients with low clinical probability 1
  • If all 8 PERC criteria are met (age <50 years, heart rate <100/min, oxygen saturation >94%, no recent surgery/trauma, no prior VTE, no hemoptysis, no unilateral leg swelling, no estrogen use), no further testing is needed 1, 2
  • If PERC criteria are not all met, proceed to D-dimer testing 1
  • A normal D-dimer level (<500 ng/mL) in low-risk patients safely excludes PE without need for imaging 1
  • For patients >50 years, consider age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff (age × 10 ng/mL) to improve specificity while maintaining sensitivity 1
  • If D-dimer is elevated, proceed to imaging studies 1

Intermediate Clinical Probability Patients

  • Order D-dimer testing for all patients with intermediate pre-test probability 1
  • A normal D-dimer level excludes PE without need for further imaging 1
  • If D-dimer is elevated, proceed to imaging studies 1

High Clinical Probability Patients

  • D-dimer testing is not recommended in high clinical probability patients as a normal result does not safely exclude PE 1
  • Proceed directly to imaging studies 1

Imaging Studies

  • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing PE when available and not contraindicated 1
  • Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scanning is an alternative when CTPA is contraindicated (contrast allergy, renal dysfunction) or unavailable 1
  • A normal perfusion scan excludes PE 1
  • A high-probability V/Q scan confirms PE in patients with high clinical probability 1
  • Lower-limb compression ultrasonography (CUS) can be considered in selected patients to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT), as finding a proximal DVT confirms PE 1
  • Echocardiography is not recommended for routine diagnosis in hemodynamically stable patients but is valuable for risk stratification 1

Special Scenarios

  • For suspected high-risk PE with shock or hypotension where CT is not immediately available, bedside echocardiography showing right ventricular overload may justify PE-specific treatment 1
  • In pregnant patients, consider V/Q scanning to reduce radiation exposure to the fetus if chest X-ray is normal 1
  • For patients with renal failure, consider V/Q scanning instead of CTPA to avoid contrast-induced nephropathy 1

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • PE symptoms are nonspecific and may be confused with other cardiopulmonary disorders, leading to underdiagnosis 3, 4
  • Failure to follow evidence-based diagnostic strategies when withholding anticoagulation despite clinical suspicion of PE is associated with increased VTE episodes and sudden death 1
  • Relying solely on clinical features without appropriate diagnostic testing is inadequate for definitive diagnosis or exclusion of PE 3
  • Overuse of CT imaging has led to increased diagnosis of less severe PEs without clear mortality benefit, while exposing patients to radiation and contrast risks 1
  • Repeated imaging is common - approximately one-third of ED patients who had CT for PE evaluation underwent another CT for the same reason within 5 years 1

By following this structured diagnostic approach, clinicians can accurately diagnose or exclude PE while minimizing unnecessary testing and radiation exposure.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pulmonary embolism: difficulties in the clinical diagnosis.

Seminars in respiratory infections, 1995

Research

Pulmonary embolus.

Australian journal of general practice, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.