CIWA Scoring for Alcohol Withdrawal Management
The Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) scoring system is used to evaluate the severity of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), guide treatment decisions, and facilitate objective communication between healthcare providers, though it should not be used alone for diagnosis of AWS.1
Understanding the CIWA Assessment
- CIWA helps evaluate AWS severity, plan treatment, and facilitate communication between healthcare providers 1
- The assessment focuses on symptoms of autonomic nervous system activation (tachycardia, sweating, tremor), gastrointestinal symptoms, and cognitive deficits 1
- High CIWA scores may also be seen in conditions similar to AWS, such as anxiolytic withdrawal, anxiety disorder, sepsis, hepatic encephalopathy, and severe pain 1
Treatment Decision Algorithm Based on CIWA Scores
- CIWA scores ≥8 indicate moderate withdrawal requiring intervention, while scores ≥15 indicate severe withdrawal with higher risk of complications 2, 3
- Patients with CIWA scores >15 are at significantly increased risk of severe alcohol withdrawal if left untreated (relative risk 3.72) 3
- For moderate to severe withdrawal (CIWA ≥8):
- For mild withdrawal (CIWA <8):
Dosing Guidelines Based on CIWA Scores
- For mild-moderate withdrawal (CIWA 8-14):
- Diazepam 5-10mg every 6-8 hours as needed 2
- For severe withdrawal (CIWA ≥15):
Treatment Setting Considerations
- Inpatient treatment is recommended for patients with:
- Outpatient treatment may be more cost-effective for patients without these risk factors, with similar abstinence rates at 6 months 1
Important Adjunctive Measures
- Administer thiamine (100-300mg/day) to all patients with AWS to prevent Wernicke encephalopathy 1, 2
- Maintain thiamine supplementation for 2-3 months following resolution of withdrawal symptoms 1
- Psychiatric consultation is recommended for evaluation, acute management, and long-term abstinence planning 1
Limitations and Caveats
- CIWA protocol is not recommended for diagnosis of AWS alone 1
- Recent research questions the reliability and validity of CIWA-Ar in acutely ill or injured hospitalized patients 6
- Some patients may still develop complications despite low CIWA scores or apparently adequate treatment 3
- Correlation between CIWA and other withdrawal scales (like mMINDS) appears strongest in patients with CIWA scores ≤10 7
- Shorter, more objective assessment tools like the Brief Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (BAWS) may be alternatives in some settings 8