What is the preferred treatment for hepatic encephalopathy, lacrulose (lactulose) or rifampin (rifampicin)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lactulose is the Preferred First-Line Treatment for Hepatic Encephalopathy

Lactulose is the recommended first-line treatment for hepatic encephalopathy, with rifaximin added only after a second recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) or when lactulose alone is insufficient. 1, 2

Treatment Algorithm for Hepatic Encephalopathy

First-Line Treatment

  • Identify and treat precipitating factors of hepatic encephalopathy as the cornerstone of management 1
  • Initiate lactulose therapy at 25 mL every 12 hours, titrating to achieve 2-3 soft bowel movements daily 1, 2
  • Lactulose reduces blood ammonia levels by 25-50%, which typically correlates with improved mental status 3
  • Lactulose is FDA-approved specifically for the prevention and treatment of portal-systemic encephalopathy 3

Second-Line/Add-on Treatment

  • Add rifaximin only after lactulose failure or for prevention of recurrence after a second episode of OHE 1, 2
  • Rifaximin should not be used alone as first-line therapy as no solid data support this approach 1, 2
  • The typical rifaximin dosage is 400 mg three times daily or 550 mg twice daily 4

Evidence Comparison Between Treatments

Lactulose Efficacy

  • Lactulose significantly improves cognitive function and health-related quality of life in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy 5
  • Recent meta-analyses of 16 RCTs showed non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose/lactitol) are associated with more frequent resolution of acute or chronic overt HE and reduced mortality 1
  • Lactulose has been shown effective as both primary and secondary prophylaxis of HE 5

Rifaximin Efficacy

  • Rifaximin has shown beneficial effects on complete resolution of HE and mortality in meta-analyses 1
  • A multinational study demonstrated rifaximin's superiority versus placebo for maintaining remission, but 91% of patients were also on lactulose 1
  • Rifaximin has been found to be equal or superior to lactulose in some studies, but is typically used as add-on therapy 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Overuse of lactulose can lead to serious complications including aspiration, dehydration, hypernatremia, severe perianal skin irritation, and can even precipitate HE 1, 2
  • Failing to identify and treat precipitating factors (present in up to 90% of cases) can lead to poor outcomes 1
  • Using rifaximin alone without lactulose is not supported by solid evidence 1, 2
  • Not considering rifaximin add-on therapy after multiple recurrences despite lactulose treatment 2

Special Considerations

  • Lactitol (another non-absorbable disaccharide) is comparable to lactulose with potentially fewer side effects and better palatability 6, 5
  • For patients not responsive to conventional therapy, consider oral branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) or IV L-ornithine L-aspartate (LOLA) 2
  • Combination therapy with lactulose and rifaximin may provide additive benefits in patients who have not responded adequately to lactulose alone 7
  • Lactulose can be administered via nasogastric tube in patients who are unable to swallow or have aspiration risk 1

In summary, lactulose remains the preferred first-line treatment for hepatic encephalopathy based on efficacy, safety, and cost considerations, with rifaximin reserved as an add-on therapy for recurrent episodes or when lactulose alone is insufficient.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hepatic Encephalopathy Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.