Second-Line Treatment for Progressive NSCLC
For patients with NSCLC that progresses after first-line therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab) are the treatment of choice for most patients with PS 0-2, regardless of PD-L1 expression, unless they received immunotherapy in first-line treatment. 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on First-Line Therapy
After First-Line Immunotherapy
- For patients who progressed after first-line immunotherapy with pembrolizumab, platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended as second-line treatment 1
After First-Line Chemotherapy (PD-L1 inhibitor-naive)
- PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors are preferred:
For Patients Not Suitable for Immunotherapy
- Single-agent chemotherapy is recommended:
Additional Options Based on Histology
For Adenocarcinoma
- Nintedanib/docetaxel combination, especially in patients progressing within 9 months from the start of first-line chemotherapy 1
For All Histologies
- Ramucirumab/docetaxel is a treatment option in patients progressing after first-line chemotherapy 1, 2
- Erlotinib represents a potential second/third-line option particularly for patients not suitable for immunotherapy or chemotherapy with unknown EGFR status or EGFR wild-type tumors 1
For Patients with Oncogenic Drivers
- Any patient with a tumor bearing an activating EGFR mutation should receive an EGFR TKI if not received previously 1
- Patients with ALK fusion should receive crizotinib if not received previously 1
Patient Selection Considerations
- Patients with PS 0-2 should be offered second-line therapy 1
- Response to first-line therapy and performance status are strong predictors of benefit from second-line treatment 3, 4
- Age alone should not determine selection of second-line therapy 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- PD-L1 testing should be performed at diagnosis to guide treatment decisions for both first and second-line therapy 1
- Treatment beyond second-line should be considered for selected patients with good performance status who had disease control with previous lines of therapy 4, 5
- The evidence suggests that patients with good performance status after progression from third-line therapy could benefit from fourth-line therapy 5
- Treatment duration should be individualized based on disease control and toxicity 1
Special Considerations
- For squamous cell carcinoma with PS 0-2 unfit for chemotherapy or immunotherapy, afatinib is a potential option 1
- Histology is an important factor in treatment selection, particularly for pemetrexed which is only effective in non-squamous histology 1, 6
- Patients who have radiological progression with ongoing clinical benefit from targeted therapies may continue treatment with the addition of local therapy to progressing sites 1