Is a screening protocol that includes Complete Blood Count (CBC), Liver Function Test (LFT), Kidney Function Test (KFT), Urine Routine, Random Blood Sugar (RBS), Thyroid Profile, Lipid Profile, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) for all patients, as well as additional tests for females and males based on age, sufficient for a comprehensive screening program?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hospital Screening Protocol Evaluation

Your proposed screening protocol is not comprehensive enough and needs significant modification to align with evidence-based guidelines for effective screening.

Basic Screening Tests for All Patients

Your basic panel for all patients includes several appropriate tests but lacks structure and evidence-based rationale:

  • Complete Blood Count (CBC), Liver Function Tests (LFT), Kidney Function Tests (KFT), and urinalysis are appropriate basic screening tests that can detect various conditions and are part of standard health assessments 1, 2
  • Random Blood Sugar (RBS) is useful but should be replaced with fasting blood glucose or HbA1c for more accurate diabetes screening 1, 2
  • Thyroid profile is not universally recommended for all patients but may be appropriate for those with symptoms or risk factors 1
  • Lipid profile is appropriate as part of cardiovascular risk assessment 1, 2
  • ESR is not recommended as a universal screening test as it's nonspecific and has limited value in asymptomatic individuals 1, 2

Cancer Biomarker Testing Issues

Your proposed cancer biomarker testing strategy has significant problems:

  • Cancer biomarkers (CA 15.3, CA 72.4, CA 125, CA 19.9, CEA, PSA) are not recommended for general population screening as they lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals 1, 3
  • These markers have high false-positive rates that can lead to unnecessary anxiety and invasive procedures 1
  • PSA testing should only be offered after shared decision-making with men aged 55-69 years, not as routine screening 1, 3

Recommended Screening Protocol

Based on current guidelines, a more appropriate hospital screening protocol would be:

For All Adult Patients:

  • Comprehensive history and physical examination 1, 2
  • Complete blood count 1, 2
  • Comprehensive metabolic panel (including liver and kidney function) 1
  • Fasting blood glucose or HbA1c 1, 2
  • Lipid profile 1, 2
  • Urinalysis 1, 2
  • Blood pressure measurement 2

Age and Sex-Specific Screening:

  • Women age 21-65: Cervical cancer screening with Pap test every 3 years or HPV testing per guidelines 1
  • Women age 40+: Annual or biennial mammography 1
  • Men and women age 45-75: Colorectal cancer screening with options including colonoscopy every 10 years, annual FIT, or other approved methods 1, 3
  • Men age 55-69: Discussion about prostate cancer screening with PSA (not automatic testing) 1, 3
  • Adults age 55-80 with smoking history: Consider lung cancer screening with low-dose CT 2, 3

Risk-Based Screening:

  • Thyroid function tests for those with symptoms or risk factors 1
  • Bone density testing for women 65+ and men 70+ or with risk factors 2
  • Additional cancer screening for those with specific risk factors or genetic predispositions 1

Implementation Considerations

For effective implementation of your hospital screening program:

  • Use scheduled appointments rather than open appointments to increase participation 4
  • Include postal or telephone reminders in your protocol to improve adherence 4
  • Ensure your system can manage follow-up of abnormal results 5, 6
  • Consider cost-effectiveness and avoid over-screening, which can lead to harm 7, 6
  • Develop clear protocols for managing positive findings 5, 8

Conclusion

Your proposed screening protocol relies too heavily on cancer biomarkers that are not recommended for general population screening. A more evidence-based approach would focus on established screening tests with proven mortality benefits while avoiding tests with high false-positive rates and limited evidence of benefit.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Annual Wellness Exam Recommendations for 75-Year-Old Males

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cancer Screening Guidelines for Adults

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.