What is the recommended method for testing for West Nile virus (WNV) infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Testing for West Nile Virus

Serologic testing for virus-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the primary diagnostic method for West Nile virus infection. Detection of anti-WNV IgM antibodies in serum and CSF is the recommended first-line testing approach for suspected West Nile virus infection. 1, 2

Primary Diagnostic Approach

  • Serologic testing should be performed on both serum and CSF samples when neuroinvasive disease is suspected 1
  • IgM antibodies to WNV become detectable 3-8 days after symptom onset and typically decrease after 2-3 months, though they may persist in serum for up to 12 months 1, 2
  • Seroconversion to anti-WNV IgM and/or IgG positivity between acute and convalescent sera (collected 7-10 days apart) strongly suggests recent WNV infection 1, 3
  • The presence of anti-WNV IgM in CSF indicates CNS infection, as these antibodies do not naturally cross the blood-brain barrier 1, 3

Specimen Collection and Transport

  • For serology testing: Collect serum in clot or serum separator tube (SST), transport at room temperature within 2 hours 1
  • For NAAT testing: Collect CSF in sterile tube, plasma in EDTA or PPT, or serum in SST, transport at room temperature within 2 hours 1
  • If initial testing is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, repeat testing is recommended, as the cumulative percentage of seropositive patients increases by approximately 10% per day during the first week of illness 1, 2

Special Considerations

  • Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT) has higher sensitivity in immunosuppressed patients due to delayed immune response and prolonged viremia 1, 2
  • False-positive results for both anti-WNV IgM and IgG antibodies may occur in patients vaccinated against yellow fever virus or following natural infection with other flaviviruses (e.g., dengue, St. Louis encephalitis viruses) 1, 4
  • To rule out cross-reactivity, specimens reactive for WNV antibodies should be tested by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) 1, 5
  • Viral culture, while possible, is insensitive and not routinely offered at local or reference laboratories 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Collect both serum and CSF samples if neuroinvasive disease is suspected 1
  2. Test for WNV-specific IgM antibodies in serum and CSF using ELISA or immunofluorescence assay 1, 6
  3. If positive, confirm with PRNT to rule out cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses 1, 5
  4. If initial testing is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, collect paired sera 7-10 days apart to detect seroconversion 1
  5. Consider NAAT testing in immunosuppressed patients, as they may have delayed antibody response 1, 2

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying solely on NAAT for diagnosis may lead to false-negative results, as viremia often precedes symptom onset 1, 2
  • Failing to collect paired sera may miss seroconversion, which is strongly suggestive of recent infection 1, 7
  • Not considering cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses, which can lead to false-positive results 1, 4
  • Interpreting the presence of anti-WNV IgG alone as evidence of acute infection, when it actually indicates prior WNV infection 1, 3
  • Traumatic lumbar puncture or defective permeability of the blood-brain barrier may lead to falsely elevated IgM levels in the CSF 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.