Diagnosing Osteomastoiditis
The best way to diagnose osteomastoiditis is through high-resolution CT of the temporal bone with IV contrast, which provides optimal visualization of bone destruction, coalescence of air cells, and associated soft tissue complications. 1
Diagnostic Algorithm
Initial Clinical Assessment
- Suspect osteomastoiditis in patients with persistent ear pain, fever, and specific physical examination findings including mastoid tenderness, retroauricular swelling, and protrusion of the auricle 2
- Evaluate for signs of intracranial complications such as headache, vertigo, meningismus, neck rigidity, seizures, or neurological deficits 1
- Examine for bulging tympanic membrane and erythema, which are present in both acute otitis media and mastoiditis 2
Imaging Approach
- Begin with plain radiographs as the first-line imaging modality, though these have limited sensitivity in early disease 1, 3
- Proceed to CT temporal bone with IV contrast when clinical suspicion for osteomastoiditis exists, especially in cases that fail to improve after 48 hours of treatment or show clinical deterioration 1
- CT temporal bone provides high spatial resolution to assess for:
Additional Imaging for Suspected Complications
- When intracranial complications are clinically suspected, MRI without and with IV contrast is preferred over CT due to its higher sensitivity and specificity 1
- MRI is superior for detecting:
Laboratory Studies
- Complete blood count with differential and inflammatory markers to assess degree of systemic inflammation 1
- Blood cultures if systemic infection is suspected 1
- Consider bone biopsy only when imaging is inconclusive or there is suspicion of unusual pathogens (e.g., actinomycosis) 4
Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Modalities
CT Temporal Bone
- Provides excellent visualization of bone destruction and coalescence 1
- High sensitivity for detecting early osteomastoiditis 3
- Addition of IV contrast improves detection of inflammatory tissue and abscesses 1
- Preferred initial imaging modality for suspected osteomastoiditis 1
MRI
- Superior for evaluating intracranial complications 1
- Better differentiates between normal and involved soft tissues 1
- Complementary to CT rather than a replacement 1
- Less effective at visualizing fine bony details compared to CT 5
Nuclear Medicine Studies
- Bone scintigraphy has reasonable sensitivity (82%) but poor specificity (25%) for chronic osteomyelitis 1
- FDG-PET has high accuracy (91%) for detecting chronic osteomyelitis 1
- Generally not first-line for osteomastoiditis diagnosis 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on otoscopic findings may miss osteomastoiditis; always examine the mastoid area in cases of severe or persistent otitis media 2
- Failing to obtain imaging in patients who don't respond to antibiotics within 48 hours 1
- Underestimating the risk of osteomastoiditis in patients previously treated with antibiotics (33-81% of mastoiditis cases had received antibiotics previously) 2, 7
- Misinterpreting post-surgical or post-traumatic changes as infection on imaging 1
- Delaying imaging when complications are suspected, as early diagnosis is crucial for preventing morbidity and mortality 1, 7
Special Considerations
- In children, diagnostic approach is similar, but there is limited evidence on the optimal imaging strategy 6
- Chronic otomastoiditis may present with more subtle clinical findings and is often associated with cholesteatoma 8
- Consider antibiotic resistance patterns when empiric therapy is initiated before culture results are available 8