What is the rate of aspergillosis (invasive fungal infection) post-influenza (flu)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Rate of Aspergillosis Post-Influenza

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) occurs in approximately 19% of patients admitted to intensive care with severe influenza, with diagnosis typically occurring within a median of 3 days after ICU admission. 1

Incidence and Risk Factors

  • The incidence of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) ranges from 14% in non-immunocompromised patients to 32% in immunocompromised patients with severe influenza requiring ICU admission 1
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis found that IAPA occurs in 28.8% of critically ill influenza patients 2
  • The incidence appears similar between influenza A and influenza B infections 1
  • IAPA can develop in patients without traditional risk factors for invasive fungal infections, representing a distinct clinical entity 3, 1

Risk Factors for Post-Influenza Aspergillosis

  • Male sex is associated with higher risk of developing IAPA 1
  • Corticosteroid use significantly increases the risk of developing aspergillosis following influenza infection 1, 4
  • Higher APACHE II scores (indicating greater disease severity) correlate with increased risk 1
  • Viral-induced lymphopenia is present in approximately 86% of cases and may be a contributing factor 3
  • Severe influenza causes respiratory epithelium disruption and impaired immune function, creating conditions favorable for Aspergillus invasion 3, 1

Diagnostic Considerations

  • Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling for culture, galactomannan testing, and PCR forms the cornerstone of diagnosis 5
  • Visual examination of the tracheobronchial tract during bronchoscopy is essential to detect invasive Aspergillus tracheobronchitis 5
  • Patients may present with nonspecific symptoms and be unresponsive to treatments for bacterial pneumonia 6
  • Early and extensive use of diagnostic tools, especially bronchoscopy, is critical for timely diagnosis 6

Clinical Outcomes and Mortality

  • The 90-day mortality rate is significantly higher in influenza patients who develop IPA (51%) compared to those without IPA (28%) 1
  • The overall mortality rate for IAPA is approximately 33.4%, but can exceed 50% despite antifungal therapy 2, 5
  • Patients with IAPA require longer duration of mechanical ventilation (mean 17.3 vs 10.5 days) compared to influenza patients without aspergillosis 2
  • IAPA is associated with longer ICU stays (mean 26.8 vs 12.8 days) and hospital length of stay (mean 38.7 vs 27.0 days) 2
  • Patients with IAPA more frequently require vasopressor support (76.4% vs 57.9%), renal replacement therapy (45.7% vs 19.1%), and ECMO (25.9% vs 12.8%) compared to influenza patients without aspergillosis 2

Emerging Trends

  • There has been an increasing number of reported cases of influenza-associated aspergillosis since 2010 3
  • Similar patterns of fungal superinfection have been observed with COVID-19, termed COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), with diagnosis rates of 10-20% in severe cases 5
  • Approximately 65% of patients who develop post-viral aspergillosis lack classic underlying conditions that typically predispose to invasive fungal infections 3

Management Considerations

  • Azoles (particularly voriconazole) are the first-choice antifungal drugs for treatment 5
  • Liposomal amphotericin B is an alternative in settings where azole resistance is prevalent 5
  • Prompt diagnosis and initiation of antifungal therapy are critical given the high mortality rates 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.