Cefpodoxime Efficacy Against Proteus mirabilis and Gram-Negative Rods
Cefpodoxime is effective against Proteus mirabilis but not against all gram-negative rods, with notable exceptions including Pseudomonas aeruginosa which is resistant to cefpodoxime. 1
Spectrum of Activity
Cefpodoxime is active against Proteus mirabilis as confirmed by the FDA drug label, which specifically lists P. mirabilis among the susceptible organisms 1
For gram-negative bacteria, cefpodoxime demonstrates good activity against:
Additional gram-negative bacteria with documented in vitro susceptibility include:
Important Limitations
- Cefpodoxime lacks activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2
- Unlike tigecycline, which has poor activity against both P. aeruginosa and P. mirabilis, cefpodoxime is effective against P. mirabilis but not P. aeruginosa 2
- For intra-abdominal infections involving Pseudomonas, alternative agents such as carbapenems, aminoglycosides, or newer combinations like ceftolozane/tazobactam would be more appropriate 2
Mechanism and Pharmacology
- Cefpodoxime is a third-generation oral cephalosporin that acts by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis 1
- It maintains activity in the presence of many beta-lactamases, both penicillinases and cephalosporinases 1, 3
- The drug achieves good tissue penetration, particularly in lung tissue where concentrations exceed the MIC90 for susceptible organisms for at least 12 hours after dosing 1
- Cefpodoxime proxetil is an orally administered prodrug that is absorbed and de-esterified by the intestinal mucosa to release the active cefpodoxime 3
Clinical Applications
- Cefpodoxime is FDA-approved for uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, or S. saprophyticus 1
- It is also indicated for skin and soft tissue infections, respiratory tract infections, and gonorrhea 1
- In comparative studies, cefpodoxime has shown efficacy similar to other beta-lactams for respiratory, urinary tract, and skin/soft tissue infections 3
Resistance Considerations
- In settings with high incidence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, extended use of cephalosporins including cefpodoxime should be discouraged due to selection pressure 2
- For intra-abdominal infections with suspected resistant pathogens, newer agents like ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam (combined with metronidazole) may be more appropriate 2
- Always obtain cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing when treating serious infections to guide therapy 2
Clinical Decision Making
- For empiric treatment of infections potentially involving P. mirabilis and other susceptible gram-negative rods, cefpodoxime is an appropriate option 1
- For suspected or confirmed Pseudomonas infections, alternative agents must be selected 2
- For serious infections, consider obtaining cultures before initiating therapy to guide appropriate antibiotic selection 2
- In patients with renal impairment, dosage adjustment may be necessary as cefpodoxime elimination is reduced 1
In summary, cefpodoxime is effective against Proteus mirabilis and several other gram-negative rods, but has important gaps in its coverage, particularly against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. When treating infections potentially involving gram-negative pathogens, understanding these limitations is essential for appropriate antibiotic selection.