What are the success rates of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for various medical conditions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiofrequency Ablation Success Rates for Various Medical Conditions

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) demonstrates excellent success rates across various cardiac arrhythmias and solid tumors, with effectiveness ranging from 71-97% depending on the specific condition being treated. 1

Cardiac Arrhythmias

Supraventricular Tachycardias

  • Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT)

    • Success rates exceed 95% with slow-pathway ablation 1
    • Complication rate is low at <1% risk of AV block 1
    • Considered first-line therapy for symptomatic AVNRT 1
  • Accessory Pathway Ablation

    • Overall success rates of 90% for all locations 1
    • Location-specific success rates:
      • Left free-wall pathways: 91% 1
      • Septal pathways: 87% 1
      • Right free-wall pathways: 82% 1
    • Long-term definitive cure rates after single or multiple procedures:
      • Midseptal: 100% 2
      • Left free wall: 98% 2
      • Right free wall: 97% 2
      • Posteroseptal: 92.7% 2
      • Right anteroseptal: 78.5% 2
  • Atrial Tachycardia/Flutter/Fibrillation

    • Atrial tachycardia: 71-73% long-term success rate 1, 3
    • Atrial flutter: 72% success rate 1
    • Atrial fibrillation:
      • 90% success in paroxysmal AF 1
      • 80% success in persistent AF 1
      • May require multiple procedures to achieve optimal outcomes 1

Ventricular Tachycardias

  • Overall success rate: 71% 1
  • Success rates vary by underlying condition:
    • Ischemic heart disease: 54% 1
    • Idiopathic cardiomyopathy: 61% 1
    • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC):
      • Combined endocardial-epicardial approach shows better results than endocardial approach alone 4
      • Should be considered for reducing VT episodes and ICD shocks rather than as curative therapy 4

Non-Cardiac Applications

Renal Tumors

  • Small renal masses (<3 cm): 100% success rate 1
  • Tumors 3-5 cm: 92% success rate 1
  • Tumors >5 cm: 25% success rate 1
  • Long-term outcomes for small renal cell carcinomas (T1a):
    • 5-year cancer-specific survival: 97.2% 1
    • 5-year overall survival: 97.2% 1
    • 5-year local recurrence-free survival: 91.7% 1
    • Comparable to partial nephrectomy outcomes 1

Spine/Pain Management

  • Lumbar facet syndrome:
    • 58% of patients report ≥50% improvement in function 5
    • 53% of patients report ≥50% improvement in pain 5
    • Durable treatment effect at median follow-up of 39 months 5

Complications and Risks

  • Cardiac RFA complications:

    • Overall complication rate: 2.1-4% 1, 6
    • Mortality rate: 0.2% 1
    • Specific complications include:
      • Valve damage 1
      • Pericardial tamponade 1
      • AV block (most common in AV node modification) 1
      • Pulmonary or systemic emboli 1
      • Vascular complications 6
    • Radiation exposure risk: approximately 1/1000 per hour of fluoroscopy for fatal malignancy 6
  • Renal RFA complications:

    • Generally low complication rates 1
    • No need for topical hemostatic agents post-ablation 1
    • Complications increase with larger tumor size 1

Important Considerations for Optimal Outcomes

  • Patient selection factors:

    • For cardiac arrhythmias: RFA is indicated for symptomatic patients who are drug-resistant, drug-intolerant, or prefer not to take long-term medications 1
    • For renal tumors: Best results achieved with tumors <4 cm; each 1 cm increase above 3.6 cm decreases recurrence-free survival by a factor of 2.19 1
  • Technical considerations:

    • For renal tumors: Temperature goal of at least 60°C is recommended to achieve irreversible cell damage 1
    • For cardiac arrhythmias: Location of the arrhythmia focus significantly impacts success rates 1, 2
    • Combined approaches (e.g., endocardial-epicardial) may be necessary for certain conditions like ARVC 4
  • Follow-up considerations:

    • Recurrence rates vary by condition and location
    • Some conditions may require multiple procedures for optimal outcomes 1, 2
    • Long-term monitoring is essential, especially for cardiac arrhythmias 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.