What are the recommended colloids and their indications in pediatric patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Colloids Selection and Indications in Pediatric Patients

Isotonic saline should be the first-choice fluid for initial resuscitation in pediatric patients with hypovolemia, with synthetic colloids reserved for specific clinical scenarios requiring large fluid volumes. 1

First-Line Fluid Therapy

  • Isotonic crystalloid solutions, particularly normal saline, are recommended as the first-choice fluid for initial resuscitation in children with hypovolemia 1
  • Initial fluid bolus should be 10-20 mL/kg with repeated doses based on individual clinical response 1
  • Crystalloids are preferred due to their effectiveness, lower cost, and wider availability compared to colloids 1, 2

Indications for Colloid Use

Specific Clinical Scenarios

  • Synthetic colloids may be considered when large amounts of fluids are required (e.g., in sepsis) due to their longer intravascular duration 1
  • Severe shock states with persistent hemodynamic instability despite initial crystalloid resuscitation 3
  • Severe burns with total body surface area >20-30% may benefit from albumin administration to maintain serum albumin levels >30 g/L 1
  • Pediatric dengue shock syndrome with pulse pressure <10 mmHg may benefit from colloid solutions 3

Types of Colloids and Their Specific Indications

  1. Albumin (5%):

    • May be considered in severe burns to reduce crystalloid administration volume 1
    • Early administration (8-12 hours post-burning) in children with burns >15% TBSA has shown decreased crystalloid requirements and reduced fluid creep 1, 4
    • Has minimal effects on hemostasis compared to synthetic colloids 5
  2. Synthetic Colloids:

    • Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES):

      • Tetrastarch (6% HES 130/0.4) has fewer adverse effects on coagulation than older HES formulations 6
      • Should be avoided in patients with renal dysfunction or coagulopathy 7
      • FDA-approved for use in pediatric postoperative volume expansion 7
      • Contraindicated in severe burns according to European Medicines Agency 1
    • Gelatins:

      • Less impact on coagulation compared to HES but greater than albumin 5
      • Higher risk of anaphylactoid reactions compared to other colloids 6
      • Limited beneficial volume effect compared to other colloids 6
  3. Dextrans:

    • Rarely used in pediatric patients due to negative effects on coagulation and potential for anaphylactic reactions 6

Clinical Considerations and Caveats

  • Cost considerations: Colloid solutions are significantly more expensive than crystalloids (albumin ~140 Euro/L, HES ~25 Euro/L, isotonic saline ~1.5 Euro/L) 1

  • Safety concerns:

    • Albumin carries a theoretical risk of viral transmission, though modern processing has minimized this risk 6
    • HES may impair coagulation and renal function, particularly at higher doses (>20 mL/kg) 7, 5
    • Colloids may leak into the interstitial space in conditions with increased capillary permeability, potentially worsening edema 1
  • In pediatric cardiac surgery for infants <5 kg, artificial colloids have shown comparable outcomes to albumin-containing priming solutions, with potentially reduced platelet consumption 8

Monitoring Response to Fluid Therapy

  • Fluid administration should be guided by clinical indicators of adequate tissue perfusion 3:

    • Normal capillary refill time
    • Absence of skin mottling
    • Warm extremities
    • Well-felt peripheral pulses
    • Return to baseline mental status
    • Adequate urine output
  • Measuring hourly resuscitation ratio (fluid infusion to urine output) can help evaluate fluid demands during resuscitation 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying fluid resuscitation in shock states can increase morbidity and mortality 3
  • Administering excessive fluid boluses in patients without shock can lead to fluid overload and respiratory complications 3
  • Using colloids as first-line therapy when crystalloids would be equally effective and less expensive 1
  • Failing to recognize hypernatremia risk in neonates, though studies have not shown significant differences in sodium levels between colloid and crystalloid administration 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Fluid Management in Pediatric Dengue

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Colloid normalizes resuscitation ratio in pediatric burns.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2011

Research

Is the use of colloids for fluid replacement harmless in children?

Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.