Should I use Epidyolex (cannabidiol) or Ospolot (sulthiame) for epilepsy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Comparison of Epidyolex (Cannabidiol) and Ospolot (Sulthiame) for Epilepsy

Epidyolex (cannabidiol) is recommended over Ospolot (sulthiame) for most types of drug-resistant epilepsy, particularly for Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, and seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, due to stronger evidence and regulatory approval. 1

Evidence Base for Each Medication

Epidyolex (Cannabidiol)

  • Epidyolex is the only cannabis-derived drug that has successfully passed clinical trials and obtained both FDA and European Medicines Agency approval specifically for epilepsy treatment 1
  • It has demonstrated effectiveness in randomized, placebo-controlled trials for drug-resistant epilepsy, particularly in specific syndromes like Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome 1
  • Cannabidiol has a specific anti-seizure mechanism of action without psychoactive effects 1

Ospolot (Sulthiame)

  • Sulthiame has been used primarily for psychomotor seizures, focal seizures, and grand mal seizures, usually in conjunction with other anticonvulsants 2
  • It has shown particular effectiveness in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and may be useful as an adjunct therapy in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome 2
  • Recent retrospective studies show some efficacy in highly pharmacoresistant epilepsy cases, with 4 out of 12 patients showing improvement in seizure frequency in a 2024 study 3

Efficacy Comparison

Epidyolex Efficacy

  • Demonstrated efficacy through rigorous clinical trials specifically for drug-resistant epilepsy 1
  • Particularly effective for Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, and seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex 1

Sulthiame Efficacy

  • In a study of 28 patients with intractable epilepsy, only 2 patients (7%) became seizure-free, while 8 patients (29%) showed >50% seizure reduction 4
  • Six out of 10 patients who initially responded positively developed tolerance within 2-5 months 4
  • More recent data shows potential efficacy in reducing spike-wave index during sleep in patients with epileptic encephalopathy 3

Safety Profile

Epidyolex Safety

  • Meta-analysis shows increased risk of adverse events compared to placebo (risk ratio 1.12 for any grade AEs, 3.39 for severe grade AEs) 5
  • Higher risk of serious adverse events (RR 2.67), events leading to discontinuation (RR 3.95), and events requiring dose reduction (RR 9.87) 5

Sulthiame Safety

  • Generally well-tolerated with reported side effects including enuresis, drowsiness, and drooling 4
  • In studies, side effects were typically not severe enough to cause treatment discontinuation 4
  • Some patients may experience somnolence/drowsiness, aggression, or increased seizure frequency 3

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. First-line consideration:

    • For Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis complex: Consider Epidyolex first 1
    • For juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Consider Sulthiame as a potential option 2
  2. Second-line or adjunctive therapy:

    • If first-line treatments (carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproic acid) fail, consider Epidyolex before Sulthiame due to stronger evidence base 6, 1
    • Consider Sulthiame as an adjunctive therapy in cases of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or epileptic encephalopathies with spike-wave activation in sleep 2, 3
  3. Special considerations:

    • For patients with genetic epilepsies: Sulthiame may be particularly effective in patients with specific genetic variants (e.g., NDUFS1 and SATB1) 3
    • For patients concerned about adverse events: Discuss the higher documented risk of adverse events with Epidyolex 5

Common Pitfalls and Considerations

  • Be aware that 6 out of 10 patients who initially respond to Sulthiame may develop tolerance within 2-5 months 4
  • Monitor for adverse events with Epidyolex, as it has a documented higher risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo 5
  • Consider that the evidence base for Epidyolex is stronger and more recent than for Sulthiame 1, 4
  • Remember that both medications are typically used as add-on therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy rather than first-line monotherapy 1, 4
  • For refractory status epilepticus, neither medication is recommended as first or second-line therapy; benzodiazepines followed by valproate, phenytoin/fosphenytoin, or levetiracetam are preferred 7, 8

References

Research

Use of cannabidiol in the treatment of epilepsy.

Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska, 2022

Research

The use of sulthiame- in myoclonic epilepsy of childhood and adolescence.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 1975

Research

Sulthiame use in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsies: A retrospective study.

Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2024

Research

[Sulthiame treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy].

No to hattatsu = Brain and development, 2009

Guideline

Alternative Treatments to Cenobamate for Partial-Onset Seizures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Refractory Seizures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Status Epilepticus Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.