AUC Values for VTE Risk Scoring Systems
The PESI score has the highest documented AUC value of 0.87 for predicting 30-day mortality in pulmonary embolism patients, while the VTE-BLEED score has an AUC of 0.72-0.75 for predicting major bleeding events during stable anticoagulation. 1, 2
VTE-BLEED Score
- VTE-BLEED was developed to predict bleeding events in patients on stable anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism 2
- AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76) for overall bleeding prediction during the complete follow-up period 2
- For prediction of major bleeding after day 30 ("stable" anticoagulation):
- AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89) in patients on dabigatran
- AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.86) in patients on warfarin 2
- In the XALIA study validation, VTE-BLEED showed good predictive value for major bleeding after day 30 and day 90 3
RIETE Score
- RIETE score was derived from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica registry 1, 4
- AUC ranging between 0.69 and 0.72 for predicting major bleeding across different time periods (first 30 days, days 31-90, days 91-180, and days 181-360) 4
- Performs better for predicting early extracranial bleeding compared to intracranial hemorrhages 4
Comparison of VTE-BLEED and RIETE
- Both scores showed similar performance with AUCs ranging between 0.69 and 0.72 across different time periods 4
- RIETE score was more useful for early extracranial bleeding prediction 4
- VTE-BLEED was more useful for late intracranial hemorrhage prediction 4
- Positive predictive values for both scores were low (0.6-3.9%), being better for early major bleeding than for later periods 4
PESI and sPESI Scores
- PESI (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index) score:
- sPESI (Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index):
CHAP (CHA₂DS₂-VASc) Score
- While mentioned in the question, specific AUC values for CHAP/CHA₂DS₂-VASc in VTE risk assessment were not provided in the available evidence
- This score is primarily used for stroke risk assessment in atrial fibrillation patients 1
ABC-Bleeding Score
- While mentioned in the question, specific AUC values for ABC-bleeding were not provided in the available evidence
VTE-PREDICT Score
- While mentioned in the question, specific AUC values for VTE-PREDICT were not provided in the available evidence
Clinical Implications
- When selecting a risk score, clinicians should consider the specific outcome they want to predict (mortality, bleeding, recurrent VTE) 5
- The usefulness of available bleeding scores may vary depending on the patient population characteristics and the time frame evaluated 4
- Dynamic scoring approaches that can be updated throughout treatment may be more useful than static scores assessed only at baseline 4
- Most bleeding risk scores have only modest predictive value for patients with VTE 6