Antibiotic Coverage for Enterococcus faecalis in Feculent Peritonitis
Empiric anti-enterococcal therapy is recommended for patients with feculent peritonitis, particularly in healthcare-associated infections, postoperative infections, and in patients who have previously received cephalosporins or other antimicrobial agents that select for Enterococcus species. 1
Indications for Anti-enterococcal Coverage
Healthcare-Associated Peritonitis
- Antimicrobial therapy for enterococci should be given when enterococci are recovered from patients with healthcare-associated intra-abdominal infections 1
- Enterococci are more prevalent in healthcare-associated infections (22.3%) compared to community-acquired infections (13.9%) 1
- In a retrospective study of patients with secondary peritonitis treated in ICU, Enterococci were isolated in 47.1% of all patients, making them the most prevalent bacteria among aerobic Gram-positive isolates 1
High-Risk Patient Populations
- Empiric anti-enterococcal therapy is specifically recommended for patients with:
- The presence of Enterococcus species, particularly in polymicrobial peritonitis, has been associated with worse outcomes 1
Antibiotic Selection for E. faecalis Coverage
First-Line Options
- Initial empiric anti-enterococcal therapy should be directed against Enterococcus faecalis 1
- Recommended antibiotics for E. faecalis coverage include:
Special Considerations
- For biofilm infections, a combination of ampicillin-ceftriaxone is recommended as it effectively targets biofilm-embedded bacteria 3
- For ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus (ARE), vancomycin is the treatment of choice 4
- For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, linezolid or tigecycline are appropriate options 1, 5
When Not to Cover for Enterococcus
- For community-acquired biliary infections, antimicrobial activity against enterococci is not required, as the pathogenicity of enterococci has not been demonstrated in this specific context 1
- Empiric therapy directed against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium is not recommended unless the patient is at very high risk, such as:
Clinical Impact and Outcomes
- Studies have shown that the presence of Enterococcus species in peritonitis is associated with worse outcomes 1, 2
- In experimental peritonitis models, high concentrations of E. faecalis enhanced the severity of infection by increasing the counts of other pathogens like E. coli and B. fragilis 6
- Enterococcus plays an important role in bacterial synergy mechanisms in peritonitis, potentially making infections more severe 6
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to cover for Enterococcus in healthcare-associated infections can lead to treatment failure and worse outcomes 1
- Prolonged antibiotic therapy (>10 days) increases the risk of enterococcal colonization and potential superinfection with resistant strains 3
- Using antibiotics that lack enterococcal coverage (such as cephalosporins alone) in high-risk patients may lead to treatment failure 2
- Not adjusting therapy when cultures reveal Enterococcus species, especially in patients with risk factors 1
In conclusion, for patients with feculent peritonitis, especially in healthcare-associated settings or with the risk factors mentioned above, empiric coverage for Enterococcus faecalis is strongly recommended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce mortality.