Syphilis Transmission Risk with a 1:1 Titer
Syphilis can be transmitted from a partner with a 1:1 titer, particularly if they have mucocutaneous syphilitic lesions present, as sexual transmission of T. pallidum occurs when such lesions are present. 1
Understanding Transmission Risk Based on Titer Levels
- A 1:1 titer is considered a low nontreponemal serologic test result, but this does not eliminate the risk of transmission if active lesions are present 1
- Sexual transmission of T. pallidum occurs only when mucocutaneous syphilitic lesions are present, which are most common in primary and secondary stages of syphilis 1
- Manifestations of infectious lesions are uncommon after the first year of infection, reducing but not eliminating transmission risk 1, 2
Clinical Significance of Low Titers (1:1)
- Low titers (1:1) may represent:
- Low titers may be associated with serological failure after treatment, particularly in HIV-infected individuals 5
Management Recommendations for Partners
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends presumptive treatment for sexual partners exposed to a patient with syphilis within the preceding 90 days, even if they are seronegative 2
- For partners exposed more than 90 days before diagnosis, presumptive treatment is recommended if serologic test results are not immediately available and follow-up is uncertain 1, 2
- The recommended treatment is benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units IM in a single dose 1, 6
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
- Nontreponemal test titers (like RPR or VDRL) usually correlate with disease activity, but interpretation must consider clinical context 1
- A titer of 1:1 is much lower than the threshold of ≥1:32, which is sometimes used to identify potentially infectious early syphilis of unknown duration 1, 2
- Testing for HIV is recommended for all patients with syphilis and their partners due to high rates of co-infection 2, 6
- The sensitivity of rapid syphilis tests may be lower with specimens having low RPR titers (1:1), potentially leading to false negatives in screening 3