Evaluation Algorithm for Pyrexia of Unknown Origin
The evaluation of pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) requires a systematic approach starting with thorough clinical assessment followed by targeted investigations, with FDG-PET/CT being the most valuable second-line imaging modality when initial workup fails to identify the cause. 1, 2
Definition and Classification
- PUO is defined as fever higher than 38.3°C (100.9°F) persisting for at least 3 weeks, with no diagnosis despite 3 outpatient visits or in-patient days 3, 1
- PUO is classified into four subcategories: classical, nosocomial, neutropenic, and HIV-related 1, 4
- Inflammation of unknown origin (IUO), defined as unexplained and prolonged elevation of inflammatory markers without fever, shares similar etiologies 3, 1
Initial Diagnostic Approach
- First-line laboratory testing should include:
Advanced Diagnostic Approach (If Initial Evaluation Inconclusive)
Second-line investigations (after 72-96 hours of persistent fever):
Third-line investigations:
- FDG-PET/CT is highly recommended when initial workup is non-diagnostic, with high sensitivity (84-86%) and diagnostic yield of approximately 56% 3, 1, 8
- FDG-PET/CT should ideally be performed within 3 days of initiation of oral glucocorticoid therapy 3, 1
- Consider myocardial suppression preparation when there is potential cardiac etiology 3, 1
- Whole body MRI may be considered, especially in pediatric patients 3, 2
- Tissue biopsy of suspicious lesions identified on imaging 7, 8
Special Considerations
Neutropenic Patients
- Require prompt evaluation and empiric antimicrobial therapy 1, 2
- Consider imaging tests to identify sources of infection, including chest radiography, CT of paranasal sinuses, chest CT, and CT of abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast 3, 2
Pediatric Patients
- Appropriate imaging tests include chest radiography, whole body MRI, and FDG-PET/CT 3, 2
- For febrile infants and young children without signs of respiratory infection, medical management without imaging is usually appropriate 3, 5
Returning Travelers
- All patients with relevant travel history should have an assessment for viral hemorrhagic fever risk 3
- Up to three daily blood films to exclude malaria 3
- Consider rapid diagnostic tests for dengue if malaria test is negative 3, 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Avoid premature closure on a diagnosis before adequate evaluation 2, 6
- Do not initiate empiric antimicrobial therapy before obtaining appropriate cultures, as this may mask the underlying cause 2, 6
- Early use of glucocorticoids may suppress inflammatory activity and lead to false negative results on imaging studies 3, 1
- Up to 50% of patients may have no cause found despite adequate investigations, but this cohort generally has a good prognosis 4, 9
- Avoid unnecessary imaging studies without specific clinical indications 5, 2
Diagnostic Algorithm Summary
Initial evaluation (0-72 hours):
- Thorough history and physical examination
- First-line laboratory tests and chest radiography
- Empiric therapy only if critically ill
Secondary evaluation (72-96 hours if fever persists):
- Targeted CT imaging based on clinical findings
- Specialized blood tests based on exposure and risk factors
- Consider infectious disease consultation
Tertiary evaluation (>96 hours if diagnosis remains elusive):
- FDG-PET/CT as the preferred advanced imaging modality
- Tissue biopsy of suspicious lesions
- Consider multidisciplinary discussion for complex cases