Why are SGLT2 (Sodium-Glucose Linked Transporter 2) inhibitors approved for type 2 diabetes but discouraged in type 1 diabetes despite increasing the risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) in both?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 vs Type 2 Diabetes: DKA Risk Considerations

SGLT2 inhibitors are approved for type 2 diabetes but contraindicated in type 1 diabetes because the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is significantly higher and more dangerous in type 1 diabetes due to absolute insulin deficiency, despite both populations experiencing increased DKA risk with these medications. 1, 2

Mechanism of DKA Risk with SGLT2 Inhibitors

  • SGLT2 inhibitors work by blocking glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubules, increasing urinary glucose excretion and lowering blood glucose levels independent of insulin action 3
  • These medications can increase ketone body production through several mechanisms:
    • Reduced insulin levels and increased glucagon secretion, shifting metabolism toward fat oxidation 4
    • Increased renal glucose excretion leading to a relative state of carbohydrate deprivation 5
    • Volume depletion that can trigger stress hormone release 1

Different Risk Profiles Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Type 1 Diabetes (Contraindicated)

  • Patients with type 1 diabetes have absolute insulin deficiency, making them inherently more susceptible to ketosis 1
  • Clinical trials showed markedly increased risk of ketoacidosis in type 1 diabetes patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors compared to placebo 6
  • FDA explicitly states: "SGLT2 inhibitors are not indicated for glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus" 1, 2
  • The risk of euglycemic DKA (ketoacidosis with normal or only slightly elevated blood glucose) is particularly concerning in type 1 diabetes, as it may delay diagnosis and treatment 5

Type 2 Diabetes (Approved)

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes typically retain some endogenous insulin production, providing some protection against ketosis 3
  • The risk-benefit profile is more favorable in type 2 diabetes due to:
    • Lower baseline risk of DKA compared to type 1 diabetes 4
    • Significant cardiovascular and renal benefits that outweigh the DKA risk 6
    • SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalizations, cardiovascular death, and slow CKD progression in type 2 diabetes 6

Clinical Benefits in Type 2 Diabetes That Justify Use Despite DKA Risk

  • SGLT2 inhibitors provide multiple benefits in type 2 diabetes beyond glycemic control:
    • Reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events 6
    • Slowed progression of chronic kidney disease with demonstrated benefits at eGFR levels as low as 20 mL/min/1.73m² 6
    • Reduced hospitalization for heart failure in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction 6
    • Weight reduction and blood pressure lowering effects 7

Preventive Strategies for DKA in Type 2 Diabetes

  • Temporary discontinuation of SGLT2 inhibitors during high-risk situations:
    • Major surgery or procedures requiring fasting 1
    • Acute illness or infection 1
    • Extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake or ketogenic diets 8
  • Patient education about signs and symptoms of DKA, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, and shortness of breath 1
  • Consider ketone monitoring in high-risk patients (those with pancreatic disorders or low insulin secretory capacity) 1
  • Avoid excessive alcohol consumption while taking SGLT2 inhibitors 5

Conclusion

The differential approval status of SGLT2 inhibitors between type 1 and type 2 diabetes reflects a careful risk-benefit assessment. While the DKA risk exists in both populations, the absolute risk is significantly higher in type 1 diabetes due to complete insulin deficiency, and the potential benefits don't outweigh this risk. In contrast, for type 2 diabetes, the cardiovascular and renal protective effects provide substantial benefits that justify their use with appropriate precautions to minimize DKA risk 6, 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.