What is the role of olaparib (Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor) in the treatment of breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Olaparib in Breast Cancer

Olaparib should be offered to patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who have germline BRCA1/2 mutations in both early-stage high-risk disease (as adjuvant therapy) and metastatic settings, as it significantly improves survival outcomes compared to standard treatments. 1

Metastatic Breast Cancer Setting

Patient Selection

  • Olaparib is indicated for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who have been previously treated with chemotherapy 1
  • Testing for germline BRCA1/2 mutations is essential to identify eligible patients for PARP inhibitor therapy 1
  • Patients can receive olaparib in first-line through third-line settings rather than chemotherapy when they are no longer benefiting from endocrine therapy (for hormone receptor-positive disease) 1

Efficacy in Metastatic Setting

  • In the OlympiAD trial, olaparib monotherapy demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival compared to standard chemotherapy (7.0 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio 0.58) 2, 3
  • Response rates were substantially higher with olaparib (59.9%) compared to standard chemotherapy (28.8%) 2
  • While final overall survival analysis showed no statistically significant improvement (19.3 vs 17.1 months; HR 0.90), there was a potential meaningful benefit in first-line metastatic setting (HR 0.51) 3
  • Beyond germline BRCA1/2, patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (50% response rate) and germline PALB2 mutations (82% response rate) also show significant benefit from olaparib 4, 5

Safety Profile in Metastatic Setting

  • Olaparib has a more favorable safety profile than chemotherapy with lower rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events (36.6% vs 50.5%) 2
  • Common side effects include anemia, nausea, and fatigue, but they are generally manageable with supportive care or dose modifications 3
  • Treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events are low (4.9%) 3
  • Quality of life measures are superior with olaparib compared to chemotherapy, with the exception of nausea/vomiting symptoms 2

Early-Stage Breast Cancer Setting

Patient Selection for Adjuvant Therapy

  • For patients with early-stage, HER2-negative breast cancer with high risk of recurrence and germline BRCA1/2 mutations, one year of adjuvant olaparib should be offered after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and local treatment 1
  • For patients who had surgery first:
    • Triple-negative breast cancer: offer olaparib if tumor size ≥2 cm or any involved axillary nodes 1
    • Hormone receptor-positive disease: offer olaparib if at least four involved axillary lymph nodes 1
  • For patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy:
    • Triple-negative breast cancer: offer olaparib if any residual cancer is present 1
    • Hormone receptor-positive disease: offer olaparib if residual disease and a clinical stage, pathologic stage, estrogen receptor, and tumor grade score ≥3 1

Efficacy in Early-Stage Setting

  • The OlympiA trial showed that one year of adjuvant olaparib following completion of local treatment and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved invasive and distant disease-free survival 1
  • While 3-year estimated overall survival was greater with olaparib, the difference was not statistically significant at the interim analysis (2.5-year median follow-up) 1

Special Considerations

Emerging Combinations

  • Combination of olaparib with immunotherapy (durvalumab) has shown promising antitumor activity with manageable safety profile in patients with germline BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer 6
  • Disease control rate at 12 weeks was 80% with the combination therapy 6

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Olaparib is not effective in patients with mutations in ATM or CHEK2 alone, despite these being homologous recombination repair genes 4
  • PARP inhibitors are DNA-interacting drugs with potential to induce hematologic malignancies; long-term follow-up for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia is needed 1
  • In the adjuvant setting, the OlympiA trial did not assess olaparib's efficacy compared to capecitabine in the post-neoadjuvant setting for triple-negative breast cancer 1
  • Resistance mechanisms can develop, including secondary BRCA2 mutations that restore the reading frame, leading to treatment failure 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.