What is the recommended initial imaging for a stable patient with a left upper quadrant (LUQ) bruit?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Imaging for a Stable Patient with Left Upper Quadrant (LUQ) Bruit

Duplex carotid Doppler ultrasonography is the recommended initial imaging modality for a stable patient with a left upper quadrant bruit to evaluate for potential splenic artery stenosis or aneurysm. 1

Diagnostic Approach

  • Duplex ultrasonography should be the first-line imaging test due to its non-invasive nature, lack of radiation exposure, and high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%) for detecting significant vascular stenosis 1
  • Ultrasound is particularly valuable as an initial screening tool for vascular abnormalities in the abdominal region, providing both anatomical and hemodynamic information 2, 3
  • The presence of a LUQ bruit correlates with potential splenic artery stenosis or aneurysm, similar to how carotid bruits correlate with systemic atherosclerosis 1, 4

Imaging Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Evaluation

  • Begin with abdominal duplex ultrasonography focused on the left upper quadrant to evaluate the splenic artery and surrounding vasculature 2, 1
  • Ultrasonography can identify potential causes of the bruit including stenosis, aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformations 2

Step 2: Follow-up Imaging (if indicated)

  • If ultrasonography reveals significant vascular abnormalities or is technically limited:

    • CT angiography (CTA) with IV contrast is recommended as the next step to provide detailed anatomic assessment of stenosis and evaluation of other abdominal vessels 5
    • CTA offers superior spatial resolution approaching that of conventional angiography with modern multidetector scanners 5
  • If CTA is contraindicated (renal impairment, contrast allergy):

    • MR angiography (MRA) with or without contrast is an acceptable alternative 5

Clinical Considerations

  • A LUQ bruit may indicate splenic artery stenosis, similar to how carotid bruits indicate potential carotid stenosis 1, 6
  • The positive predictive value of bruits for significant stenosis is relatively low (approximately 30%), which increases the importance of radiographic evaluation 2
  • Abdominal bruits may have prognostic significance, as diastolic components can indicate more severe stenosis 4, 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Avoid proceeding directly to invasive angiography as an initial test, as non-invasive options provide sufficient diagnostic information in most cases 2, 1
  • Do not order MRI or CT perfusion studies as initial tests in the evaluation of asymptomatic bruits 1
  • Be aware that ultrasonography is operator-dependent, and its accuracy may be limited by patient body habitus or bowel gas 2, 3
  • Remember that CTA may underestimate stenosis in the setting of tortuosity or dense calcifications, and may overestimate stenosis in cases of very severe near-occlusive stenosis 5

References

Guideline

Management of Carotid Artery Bruit in the Emergency Department

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Abdominal bruits in renovascular hypertension.

The American journal of cardiology, 1976

Guideline

Appropriate CT Scan for Incidental Internal Carotid Calcification

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

How to diagnose, how to treat: renal artery stenosis-diagnosis and management.

Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.