Does using clips during a vasectomy result in more pain compared to not using clips?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vasectomy with Clips vs. No Clips: Pain Comparison

Minimally-invasive vasectomy techniques without clips cause less pain and fewer complications than techniques using clips. 1, 2

Evidence on Vasectomy Techniques and Pain

  • The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend minimally-invasive vasectomy (MIV) techniques, such as no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV), which are associated with less discomfort during the procedure and fewer surgical complications 1
  • The AUA specifically recommends vas occlusion techniques that do not use clips or ligatures, including mucosal cautery with or without fascial interposition 1, 2
  • Research shows that minimally invasive approaches reduce pain, bruising, swelling, and overall complication rates compared to conventional techniques 3
  • The no-scalpel technique has been demonstrated to reduce operative complications, shorten operative time, and hasten resumption of sexual activity 4

Recommended Occlusion Techniques

The AUA guidelines recommend four specific occlusion techniques, none of which involve clips:

  1. Mucosal cautery of both ends of the divided vas with fascial interposition (without ligation or clips) 1, 2
  2. Mucosal cautery of both ends without fascial interposition (without ligation or clips) 1, 2
  3. Open testicular end with mucosal cautery of abdominal end with fascial interposition (without ligation or clips) 1, 2
  4. Non-divisional extended electrocautery 1, 2

Pain Considerations and Complications

  • The primary sources of intraoperative and early postoperative pain are related to the method of vas isolation rather than the method of occlusion 1
  • Minimally invasive techniques that avoid clips result in significantly reduced recovery time and less post-operative pain 3
  • Studies have shown extremely low complication rates with no-scalpel vasectomy techniques that don't use clips - as low as 0.047% for hematomas and 0.07% for painful nodules 5
  • Using clips may contribute to post-vasectomy pain syndrome, which can be a long-term complication 4

Anesthesia Considerations

  • Local anesthesia with or without oral sedation is recommended for vasectomy procedures 2
  • Using the smallest available needle (25-32 gauge) minimizes pain during anesthetic injection 2
  • For needle-phobic patients, pneumatic injector (jet or no-needle device) can be considered, though evidence doesn't clearly show superiority over small gauge needles 2

Key Principles for Optimal Outcomes

  • The minimally-invasive approach follows two essential principles: small openings (≤10 mm) in the scrotal skin and minimal dissection of the vas and perivasal tissues 2
  • Specialized instruments such as a vas ring clamp and vas dissector facilitate the procedure and reduce tissue trauma 2
  • Proper vas identification and gentle handling of tissues are crucial to minimize pain and complications 2
  • Vasectomy performed with these techniques has been shown to be safe, effective, and practical with an overall failure rate of less than 1% 6, 4

In conclusion, the evidence strongly supports using minimally-invasive techniques without clips for vasectomy to minimize pain and complications while maintaining high efficacy rates.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Minimally-Invasive Vasectomy Techniques

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Minimally invasive vasectomy.

British journal of urology, 1996

Research

Common questions about vasectomy.

American family physician, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.