What are the stages of prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prostate Cancer Staging

The TNM staging system is the standard classification method for prostate cancer, categorizing the disease based on primary tumor characteristics (T), regional lymph node involvement (N), and distant metastasis (M) to determine prognosis and guide treatment decisions. 1

TNM Classification

T (Primary Tumor) Classification:

  • T1: Clinically inapparent tumor not palpable or visible by imaging 2

    • T1a: Incidental finding in ≤5% of resected tissue with Gleason score <7 2
    • T1b: Incidental finding in >5% of resected tissue 2
    • T1c: Tumor identified by needle biopsy due to elevated PSA 1
  • T2: Tumor confined to the prostate 2

    • T2a: Tumor involves one-half of one lobe or less 2
    • T2b: Tumor involves more than one-half of one lobe but not both lobes 2
    • T2c: Tumor involves both lobes 2
  • T3: Tumor extends through the prostate capsule 1

    • T3a: Extracapsular extension (unilateral or bilateral) 2
    • T3b: Tumor invades seminal vesicle(s) 2
  • T4: Tumor is fixed or invades adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles (bladder neck, external sphincter, rectum, levator muscles, and/or pelvic wall) 2, 1

N (Regional Lymph Nodes) Classification:

  • NX: Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed 2
  • N0: No regional lymph node metastasis 2
  • N1: Metastasis in regional lymph node(s) 2

M (Distant Metastasis) Classification:

  • MX: Presence of distant metastasis cannot be assessed 2
  • M0: No distant metastasis 2
  • M1: Distant metastasis 2
    • M1a: Non-regional lymph node(s) 2
    • M1b: Bone(s) 2
    • M1c: Other site(s) with or without bone disease 2

Gleason Score and Grade Groups

  • The Gleason score is a critical component of prostate cancer staging, determined by adding the grades of the two most common histologic patterns seen in each biopsy core 2
  • Each pattern is scored from 1 to 5, with 5 being the most poorly differentiated 2
  • Gleason score interpretation:
    • Score 6: Well-differentiated tumor (better prognosis) 2
    • Score 7: Intermediate differentiation (4+3 is more aggressive than 3+4) 2
    • Scores 8-10: Poorly differentiated (worse prognosis) 2

Risk Stratification

Based on TNM stage, Gleason score, and PSA level, prostate cancer is stratified into risk groups 2:

  • Very Low Risk: T1c, Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, <3 cores positive for cancer, ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 2

  • Low Risk: T1-T2a, Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL 2

  • Intermediate Risk: T2b-T2c OR Gleason score 7 OR PSA 10-20 ng/mL 2

  • High Risk: T3a OR Gleason score 8-10 OR PSA >20 ng/mL 2

Clinical vs. Pathological Staging

  • Clinical staging (cTNM) is based on physical examination, imaging studies, and biopsy results before treatment 1
  • Pathological staging (pTNM) is based on surgical specimens after radical prostatectomy and is generally more predictive of prognosis 1
  • Clinical understaging occurs in more than 50% of cases, highlighting the limitations of pre-treatment assessment 3, 4

Prognostic Significance

  • Extraprostatic extension (T3) and seminal vesicle involvement (T3b) are associated with significantly increased risk of disease progression 1
  • Only about 25% of patients with T3b disease remain biochemically progression-free at 10 years 1
  • Lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors, with the volume of nodal metastasis being a key determinant of outcomes 5

Recent Developments

  • Integration of molecular and genetic markers with anatomical staging may enhance prognostic accuracy in the future 1
  • Some experts suggest that the three-tiered T2 classification system is superfluous and that a tumor size-based substaging system may be more appropriate for future TNM classifications 5
  • The current TNM system has been criticized for not adequately accounting for multifocal tumors, which occur in more than half of prostate cancer cases 6

Clinical Application

  • The TNM stage, combined with Gleason score and PSA level, should guide treatment decisions 2, 1
  • Organ-confined disease (T1-T2) may be suitable for curative local therapy, while locally advanced disease (T3-T4) may require multimodal approaches 1
  • Node-positive disease (N1) may benefit from early hormonal therapy 1

References

Guideline

Prostate Cancer Staging and Prognosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Staging of prostate cancer.

Histopathology, 2012

Research

Staging prostate cancer.

Microscopy research and technique, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.