What is the false statement regarding a 22-year-old female patient with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 10, an 8-centimeter spleen lesion with subscapular subcapsular hematoma, hypotension, and tachycardia, who has fallen from a motorcycle: A) the patient can be followed up without emergent operation, B) there is intermediate brain damage, or C) the patient is hemodynamically stable?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of a 22-Year-Old Female Motorcycle Trauma Patient

Statement C, "the patient is hemodynamically stable," is false. With a blood pressure of 110/55 mmHg and heart rate of 100 beats per minute, this patient shows signs of early hemodynamic instability that requires immediate intervention.

Patient Assessment

  • The patient presents with multiple concerning findings:
    • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 10, indicating moderate brain injury 1
    • 8 cm splenic lesion with subcapsular hematoma, suggesting a grade 2-3 splenic injury 1
    • Tachycardia (100 bpm) with borderline blood pressure (110/55 mmHg), suggesting early compensatory response to blood loss 1

Hemodynamic Status Analysis

  • According to WSES guidelines, hemodynamic instability is defined as:

    • Systolic BP < 90 mmHg with evidence of skin vasoconstriction, altered level of consciousness, or shortness of breath, OR
    • BP > 90 mmHg but requiring fluid boluses/transfusions and/or vasopressors, OR
    • Base excess > -5 mmol/l, OR
    • Shock index > 1, OR
    • Transfusion requirement of at least 4-6 units of packed RBCs within 24 hours 1
  • This patient has:

    • Tachycardia (100 bpm) with systolic BP of 110 mmHg
    • Shock index of 0.91 (heart rate/systolic BP = 100/110), approaching the critical threshold of 1.0 1
    • Altered mental status (GCS 10)
    • These findings together indicate early compensatory shock 1

Brain Injury Assessment

  • GCS score of 10 indicates moderate brain injury 1
  • This level of brain injury requires careful monitoring and management to prevent secondary brain injury 1
  • The combination of splenic injury and brain trauma requires special consideration, as hypotension from splenic bleeding can worsen secondary brain injury 2

Splenic Injury Management

  • The 8 cm splenic lesion with subcapsular hematoma likely represents a grade 2-3 splenic injury according to the AAST classification 1

  • In a polytrauma patient with both splenic and brain injuries, immediate operative management is indicated when 3:

    • The patient shows signs of hemodynamic instability
    • There is risk of secondary brain injury from hypotension
    • The patient requires prolonged transport or monitoring is limited
  • The World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines recommend operative management in patients with splenic injuries and concomitant brain injuries, particularly when the patient shows signs of hemodynamic compromise 1, 3

Correct Answer Analysis

  • Statement A (patient can be followed up without emergent operation): False - With hemodynamic instability, brain injury, and significant splenic trauma, emergent operation is indicated 1, 3
  • Statement B (intermediate brain damage): True - GCS of 10 indicates moderate brain injury 1
  • Statement C (patient is hemodynamically stable): False - Tachycardia with borderline blood pressure indicates early compensatory shock 1
  • Statement D (grade of splenic injury is 2-3): True - An 8 cm lesion with subcapsular hematoma is consistent with grade 2-3 injury 1
  • Statement E (polytrauma patient): True - The combination of significant splenic injury and brain trauma constitutes polytrauma 1

Management Recommendations

  • Immediate surgical intervention is indicated due to:

    • Signs of hemodynamic compromise 1
    • Significant splenic injury with subcapsular hematoma 1
    • Concomitant brain injury that could be worsened by ongoing blood loss 2
    • Risk of delayed splenic rupture if managed non-operatively 3
  • Operative management should aim for splenic preservation when possible, but splenectomy may be necessary if bleeding cannot be controlled 1, 3

  • Careful monitoring of neurological status and prevention of secondary brain injury is essential 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Blunt splenic injury and severe brain injury: a decision analysis and implications for care.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2015

Guideline

Indications for Splenectomy in Trauma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.