What are the diagnostic criteria for acute leukemia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Leukemia

The diagnosis of acute leukemia requires a comprehensive approach including bone marrow examination with morphologic evaluation, immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis, and molecular genetic testing, with at least 30% blast cells in the bone marrow aspirate being the primary diagnostic criterion. 1

Initial Diagnostic Workup

Required Specimens and Laboratory Tests

  • Complete blood count (CBC) with peripheral blood (PB) differential count and smear review 1
  • Bone marrow (BM) aspirate, touch imprint, cell clots, and core biopsy for morphologic examination 1
  • If BM aspirate is unobtainable or results in a dry tap, perform cell count and review morphology on touch imprint preparation 1
  • Comprehensive metabolism panel to monitor for potential tumor lysis syndrome at diagnosis and during treatment 1

Essential Diagnostic Tests

  • Multicolor comprehensive flow cytometry on BM aspirate (or PB if BM unavailable) to determine lineage (B-ALL, T-ALL, AML, or MPAL) 1, 2
  • Conventional karyotyping (must be performed on BM) 1
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) according to the subclassification of acute leukemia 1
  • Molecular studies (PCR, RT-PCR, NGS) selective based on the subtype of acute leukemia 1

Specific Criteria by Leukemia Type

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

  • Morphologic examination showing ≥20% myeloblasts in BM or PB 3
  • Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nonspecific esterase (NSE) for diagnosis and subclassification 1, 4
  • Rapid FISH for PML-RARA if acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is suspected 1
  • Molecular testing for FLT3-ITD, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, WT1, DNMT3A, and/or TP53 for prognosis and targeted therapy 1
  • Additional testing for CEBPA, RUNX1, KIT (when core-binding factor AML is diagnosed) 1
  • DIC profile only if APL is suspected 1

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

  • Morphologic examination showing ≥20% lymphoblasts in BM or PB 3
  • FISH for t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2)/BCR-ABL1 and KMT2A(MLL) gene translocation in adult ALL 1
  • FISH for t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1)/ETV6-RUNX1, iAMP21, Trisomy 4 and 10, t(9;22) in childhood ALL 1
  • Molecular studies for PAX-5, JAK1, JAK2, and/or IKZF1 for B-ALL 1
  • Molecular studies for NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 for T-ALL 1

Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (MPAL)

  • FISH for t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2)/BCR-ABL1 1
  • FISH for KMT2A(MLL) gene translocation 1
  • Flow cytometry showing expression of both myeloid and lymphoid markers 2, 5

Extramedullary Acute Leukemia

  • If PB or BM is positive, no additional biopsy of extramedullary tumor is necessary 1
  • If no BM or PB involvement, tissue biopsy with morphologic examination, immunophenotyping, and cytogenetics is required 1

Cerebrospinal Fluid Evaluation

  • Lumbar puncture with CSF cell count and cytology examination 1
  • Flow cytometry on CSF 1
  • IHC study with TdT stain for ALL 1

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Flow cytometric immunophenotyping and karyotype analysis have been implemented in most diagnostic laboratories (99% and 96%, respectively), while cytochemical studies are less common and mainly used when limited samples are available or flow cytometry results are ambiguous 1
  • Detailed immunophenotypic profiles can be associated with specific molecular defects and well-defined biology 2, 5
  • Genetic abnormalities are present in more than 80% of ALLs and more than 90% of AMLs, making cytogenetic and molecular analysis crucial for proper classification 5
  • Proper specimen handling is critical - harvested specimens (fresh, frozen, or paraffin embedded) and their nucleic acid products should be properly identified and stored under appropriate conditions for additional diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic purposes 1, 3
  • Sudan Black B, periodic acid-Schiff, or acid phosphatase are not recommended as routine tests for acute leukemia 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Flow cytometry in the diagnosis of acute leukemia.

Seminars in hematology, 2001

Research

Laboratory diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia.

Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2001

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.