What is the comparison between Incrediwear (compression garment) and standard compression therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 27, 2025 • View editorial policy

From the Guidelines

Incrediwear is preferable for patients who prioritize comfort and gentle circulation enhancement, while traditional compression garments are better suited for those requiring stronger support and swelling control, particularly in acute injuries, post-surgical recovery, and athletic activities. The decision between Incrediwear and compression garments should be based on individual needs, considering factors such as the type of condition being treated, personal comfort, and specific requirements for support and circulation enhancement.

When considering the use of compression garments, it's essential to note that they work by physically squeezing the limb to improve circulation, reduce swelling, and provide structural support, as discussed in the context of managing venous thromboembolism and postthrombotic syndrome 1, 2, 3. The effectiveness of compression therapy can vary, with some studies suggesting benefits in reducing the risk of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and improving symptoms in patients with chronic venous disease 2, 4. However, the evidence also highlights the importance of proper fitting, education, and adherence to compression therapy to achieve optimal outcomes 4.

In contrast, Incrediwear utilizes semiconductor technology to release negative ions, enhancing blood flow without the need for compression, making it a more comfortable option for all-day wear. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals with chronic conditions or those who find traditional compression uncomfortable. The choice between Incrediwear and compression garments should be guided by the specific needs of the patient, taking into account the nature of their condition, lifestyle, and personal preferences.

Key considerations include:

  • The level of support and swelling control required
  • The individual's tolerance for compression and potential discomfort
  • The specific condition being treated (e.g., acute injury, chronic venous disease, post-surgical recovery)
  • Lifestyle factors, such as the need for comfort during extended wear or athletic activities
  • The importance of gentle circulation enhancement versus stronger support

Ultimately, the decision should prioritize the patient's comfort, adherence to treatment, and overall quality of life, while also considering the clinical evidence supporting the use of compression therapy in various scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4.

From the Research

Comparison of Incrediwear and Standard Compression Therapy

  • The study 5 compared Incrediwear, a non-compressive sleeve, with standard compression stockings after total knee arthroplasty.
  • The results showed that Incrediwear subjects had lower levels of effusion and greater flexion range of motion compared to controls at 3 weeks post-operatively.
  • Incrediwear subjects experienced a 19% decrease in effusion, while controls experienced a 35% increase in effusion.
  • In terms of flexion range of motion, Incrediwear subjects had a 3% decrease, while controls had a 7% decrease.

Standard Compression Therapy

  • Standard compression therapy is a physical therapy with few side effects, used especially in patients with edema of the lower extremities 6.
  • Compression therapy can be carried out with a large proportion of patients with edema of the lower extremities, despite contraindications such as advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease and polyneuropathy 6.
  • Medical compression stockings should always be prescribed based on symptoms and with the lowest effective interface pressure to optimize tolerability 7.

Innovations in Compression Therapy

  • Innovative concepts of medical compression therapy include the use of medical compression stockings with an integrated care formula and additional skincare to improve quality of life and compliance in patients with chronic venous insufficiency 7.
  • Two-component compression stocking systems and multicomponent compression bandages have been proven to be effective in the decongestion phase of edema 7.
  • The S.T.R.I.D.E. decision support system can be used to choose specific compression devices that can be adjusted to counteract individual signs and symptoms in an optimally adopted way 8.

Indications for Medical Compression Stockings

  • Medical compression stockings are a standard, non-invasive treatment option for all venous and lymphatic diseases 9.
  • The International Compression Club provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications for treatment with medical compression stockings, including chronic and acute venous disorders 9.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.