From the Guidelines
Incrediwear and traditional compression therapy have different mechanisms of action, and the choice between them should be based on individual patient needs and comfort preferences. Incrediwear uses semiconductor technology to increase circulation without compression, making it a more comfortable option for all-day wear, especially for those who find traditional compression uncomfortable 1. On the other hand, traditional compression therapy applies graduated pressure to improve blood flow, reduce swelling, and provide structural support, making it effective for managing edema and providing stability 1.
Key Differences
- Incrediwear is more suitable for chronic pain, arthritis, or recovery without significant swelling, as it increases circulation without compression 1.
- Traditional compression therapy is more beneficial for acute injuries with significant swelling, as it applies graduated pressure to improve blood flow and reduce swelling 1.
- Patient comfort and adherence to therapy are crucial, and education and specialized care can enhance adherence to traditional compression therapy 1.
Clinical Considerations
- The use of compression stockings has a negligible effect on mortality, but may reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and pulmonary embolism (PE) 1.
- The American College of Radiology recommends a minimum pressure of 20 to 30 mm Hg for compression therapy, with higher pressures advised for more severe disease 1.
- Incrediwear and traditional compression therapy can be used in combination, with compression garments used for immediate post-injury or during high-intensity activities, and Incrediwear used for longer recovery periods or daily pain management.
Recommendation
Based on the most recent and highest quality study, traditional compression therapy is recommended for patients with acute injuries or significant swelling, while Incrediwear may be preferred for patients with chronic pain or arthritis 1. Ultimately, the choice between Incrediwear and traditional compression therapy should be guided by individual patient needs and comfort preferences, and consulting with a healthcare provider can help determine the most appropriate option.
From the Research
Comparison of Incrediwear and Traditional Compression Therapy
- There are no direct comparisons between Incrediwear (compression garment) and traditional compression therapy in the provided studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
- Traditional compression therapy is highly effective in treating venous diseases, including leg edema, and can be achieved through various modalities such as graduated compression stockings, inelastic bandages, and pneumatic compression devices 2, 3, 5.
- The effectiveness of compression therapy depends on various factors, including the type of compression material, pressure levels, and gradient distribution 5.
- Studies have shown that graduated compression stockings with different pressure profiles can have significant influences on venous anatomy and haemodynamics, and can be effective in reducing venous dilation and improving venous return 5.
- Modern compression therapy can be tailored to individual patient needs, and there are various compression materials and systems available, including two-layer compression systems with controlled compression and low profile 4, 6.
- Patient compliance is a major factor in the success of compression therapy, and can be improved by selecting appropriate compression therapy and providing adequate patient education 2, 6.