What are the differences between General Anesthesia (GA), Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC), and Sedation-Analgesia Block (SAB) for hysteroscopy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anesthetic Techniques for Hysteroscopy: GA vs MAC vs SAB

For hysteroscopy procedures, Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is generally recommended as the first-line approach due to its favorable safety profile, though General Anesthesia (GA) remains appropriate for complex cases or patients with specific risk factors. 1, 2, 3

General Anesthesia (GA) for Hysteroscopy

  • GA involves complete unconsciousness with airway control via endotracheal intubation, providing optimal surgical conditions and complete patient immobility 1

  • Technique:

    • Induction: Propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg IV (may cause apnea lasting >60 seconds in 12% of adult patients) 4
    • Airway management: Endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation 1
    • Maintenance: Inhalational agents (sevoflurane/desflurane) or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol infusion 5
    • Analgesia: Opioids (fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg or remifentanil infusion) 6
  • Advantages:

    • Secure airway with controlled ventilation 1
    • Better for complex or lengthy procedures 2
    • May provide better functional outcomes in high-risk procedures 1
  • Disadvantages:

    • Higher incidence of hypotension (59% vs 14% with MAC) 1
    • Increased vasopressor requirements (44% vs 7% with MAC) 1
    • Longer recovery time and delayed discharge 3

Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) for Hysteroscopy

  • MAC involves sedation with spontaneous breathing while maintaining responsiveness to verbal or tactile stimulation 1

  • Technique:

    • Two main approaches:

      1. Nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS): Single-agent propofol titrated to deep sedation 1
      2. Balanced propofol sedation (BPS): Combination of benzodiazepine, opioid, and propofol targeted to moderate sedation 1
    • Typical regimen:

      • Propofol: Initial 0.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 25-75 mcg/kg/min infusion 4, 6
      • With opioid: Remifentanil (0.5 mcg/kg bolus followed by 0.05 mcg/kg/min) or fentanyl (1 mcg/kg bolus with 0.5 mcg/kg supplemental doses) 6
      • Slow infusion or injection techniques are preferable over rapid bolus to minimize cardiorespiratory effects 4
  • Advantages:

    • Lower incidence of hypotension (14% vs 59% with GA) 1
    • Reduced vasopressor requirements (7% vs 44% with GA) 1
    • Faster recovery and shorter hospitalization 3
    • Patient preference and higher satisfaction reported 2
  • Disadvantages:

    • Risk of respiratory depression, especially with rapid bolus administration 4
    • Potential for inadequate analgesia requiring deeper sedation 7
    • May be associated with more adverse respiratory events than GA 1

Sedation-Analgesia Block (SAB) for Hysteroscopy

  • SAB typically refers to local anesthesia with sedation for hysteroscopy 8, 2

  • Technique:

    • Local anesthesia: Paracervical or intracervical block with 1% lidocaine (5-10 mL) 8, 2
    • Sedation: Combination of:
      • Benzodiazepine (midazolam 1-2 mg IV)
      • NSAID (ketorolac 15-30 mg IV)
      • Low-dose opioid (fentanyl 25-50 mcg IV) 2
  • Advantages:

    • Office-based procedure capability 2
    • Avoidance of general anesthesia risks 2
    • Faster recovery and discharge 8
    • Cost-effective approach 2
  • Disadvantages:

    • May be insufficient for complex or lengthy procedures 8
    • Pain during cervical canal passage (highest pain point, VAS 2.47±2.48) 8
    • May require conversion to deeper sedation or GA if inadequate 2

Patient Selection and Recommendations

  • For simple diagnostic hysteroscopy:

    • SAB or light MAC is typically sufficient 8, 2
    • Office-based procedures with local anesthesia and minimal sedation are associated with high patient satisfaction 2
  • For operative hysteroscopy (myomectomy, polypectomy):

    • MAC with propofol-based sedation is generally appropriate and safe 3
    • Recent evidence shows comparable complete resection rates between MAC (87.8%) and GA (88.8%) for hysteroscopic myomectomy 3
  • For complex cases or high-risk patients:

    • GA may be preferred for lengthy procedures or complex pathology 2
    • Patients with significant comorbidities may benefit from GA with controlled ventilation 1

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Hypotension management:

    • MAC is associated with less hypotension than GA, but still requires monitoring 1, 9
    • For mild hypotension, administer small boluses (5-10 mL/kg) of crystalloids 9
    • For persistent hypotension, consider vasopressors (norepinephrine first choice) 9
  • Respiratory monitoring:

    • Continuous capnography is essential during MAC to detect early respiratory depression 7
    • Avoid rapid bolus administration of propofol during MAC to prevent respiratory complications 4
  • Elderly patients:

    • Require reduced doses of sedatives and local anesthetics 7
    • Consider processed EEG monitoring to avoid excessive anesthetic depth 5
    • Target lighter anesthesia (BIS ~50) to reduce postoperative delirium risk 5
  • Timing considerations:

    • In premenopausal women, optimal timing for hysteroscopy is during follicular phase after menstruation 2
    • Pregnancy should be excluded before performing hysteroscopy 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Depth of Anesthesia Management During Surgical Procedures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Monitored Anesthesia Care for Shoulder Surgery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Hypotension Secondary to Sedation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.